How are cabinet ministers likely to vote on assisted dying?

A picture


The private member’s bill introduced by the Labour MP Kim Leadbeater that would legalise assisted suicide for people who are terminally ill with less than six months to live will get its first Commons vote on 29 November.As it is a free vote, there is no government position.Cabinet ministers have been asked to stay neutral, although they can confirm previously stated views if directly asked.This is what we know about the cabinet’s likely stances.The most vocal cabinet opponent of the idea – to an extent that has annoyed some colleagues and other MPs who support the bill.

While he voted for assisted dying in 2015, the health secretary is expected to vote against it this time.He has expressed worry about people feeling coerced into dying, and said better palliative care could be a solution.He also suggested that assisted dying could use up NHS resources, requiring cuts elsewhere – something vigorously disputed by others.The deputy prime minister voted against changing the law in 2015 and her view is not believed to have changed.She has not said anything publicly during the current debate.

The justice secretary has expressed views against assisted dying, and voted against it in 2015.She said earlier this year: “I don’t intend to support it in the future … I feel that once you cross that line you’ve crossed it for ever.If it just becomes the norm that at a certain age, or with certain diseases, you are now a bit of a burden … that’s a really dangerous position to be in.”The education secretary voted against assisted dying in 2015, and said on Monday that she was likely to do the same again.She told Sky News: “It’s for individual members of parliament to decide what they believe is best.

This is a very sensitive issue,It’s difficult for everyone,As you say, back in 2015 I voted against that legislation, and I haven’t changed my mind,”The business secretary said in October that he was still against assisted dying, having voted against it in 2015,“I would really worry about how we would protect vulnerable people from that,” he said.

The foreign secretary voted against the assisted dying bill in 2015.Last year he spoke on his LBC show about feeling “torn” because of his strong Christian faith.“I’m worried that we start somewhere and that it sort of ends up leading to legalised murder,” he said.“I’m just worried that certain types of people might find themselves encouraging others to help them go, not because they want to go or should go but more because of the financial burden.”The energy secretary was one of the first cabinet ministers to confirm he would vote for assisted dying after it was confirmed a bill would be brought forward.

He told ITV: “I think the current situation is rather cruel, actually.I think people having control over their own life and their own death is something that is the right thing to do.Obviously there have to be proper safeguards and I understand the concerns of some people on these issues, but my personal view will to be vote in favour of this bill.”The home secretary said on Friday that her view had not changed since 1997, when she voted for assisted dying.Asked for her view by ITV’s Good Morning Britain, Cooper said: “I have voted for change in the past.

These are important and difficult issues, and I haven’t changed my view on the principles of this issue.But I do also recognise that there is a detailed debate to be had on the detail of legislation on the kinds of safeguards and things that need to be in place.”The work and pensions secretary said last week that she backed the change, telling the BBC: “Yes, I will be voting for the bill.” She went on: “I’ve always believed in giving people as much choice and control as possible, and with all the right safeguards which this bill has, I believe it’s a really important step forward on such a difficult issue, giving people that choice and control.”The culture secretary was one of the first cabinet members to back the bill, saying she supported a change to the law despite agreeing with Streeting that palliative care provision should be better.

She told the BBC: “I’ve just seen too many examples of people who have no choices and no dignity at the end of their lives,And I think the current system is unsustainable,”The science secretary voted for assisted dying in 2015 and gave a strong speech in favour of changing the law,He said at the time: “In the most profound moment in everyone’s life, the moment of death, we have no control at all,For those in the knowledge of their imminent death, I think this is wrong.

”The Northern Ireland secretary has voted for assisted dying in the past and still holds views in favour of changing the law.The prime minister voted to allow assisted dying when it last went before the Commons in 2015.Last December he confirmed this was still his view, saying: “I personally do think there are grounds for changing the law.Traditionally this has always been dealt with through a private member’s bill and a free vote, and that seems appropriate to me.”Speaking en route to the G20 summit this week, Starmer confirmed he would vote but declined to say how, saying it was “very important we maintain neutrality”.

The transport secretary has indicated she will back the bill, as she did in 2015.She told Sky News on Sunday: “I am still considering.It’s a matter of public record that I voted in favour last time and that is where I am leaning, totally honestly.But I am really conscious that there are concerns, particularly from disabled advocacy groups and concerns around palliative care.So I am considering that.

”The Cabinet Office minister supported assisted dying in 2015 but has not been drawn on his position since,The leader of the House of Commons voted for changing the law in 2015,Separately, she has sought to assure MPs that Leadbeater’s bill will receive proper scrutiny in the Commons, saying: “As it’ll be the first item of business on 20 November, it is highly likely that the second reading debate will last for the full five hours,This is comparable or longer to any other bill, perhaps longer,Should the house agree to a second reading, it would then be considered in committee for likely several weeks.

”The secretary of state for Wales voted for changing the law in 2015, but has not commented thus far.The chancellor is undecided and has not previously voted on the issue.She told the Times earlier this year: “I haven’t made up my mind about assisted dying.I would need to give it more consideration.I can understand why people would want it … My worry would be that people would feel under pressure: ‘I’m no good for anybody; people would be better off without me.

’ That would worry and scare me, so I’d want to make sure that the right safeguards were in place.”More recently, she said of Leadbeater’s bill that she would be “looking at all the evidence ahead of the vote in parliament”, declining to say how she might vote.The defence secretary missed the 2015 vote, supported the bill in 1997, and has yet to comment this time.The environment secretary also did not vote in 2015, and has not publicly expressed a view this time.
politicsSee all
A picture

Pro-Brexit views not protected from workplace discrimination, tribunal rules

Supporting Brexit is not a belief that is protected from workplace discrimination, an employment tribunal has ruled, as a former Ukip councillor lost her claim that she was bullied and harassed by her charity employer because she supported the UK’s departure from the EU.Colette Fairbanks was sacked from her job at the drug and alcohol rehabilitation charity Change Grow Live after sharing “offensive” posts about immigrants on social media, a tribunal hearing was told.Fairbanks argued that her political views were philosophical beliefs protected by the Equality Act. These included a belief the UK should be outside of the EU, an opposition to illegal migration and being happy to leave the European convention on human rights.However the tribunal found that these were not beliefs protected by the Equality Act

A picture

‘He was for us’: everyone has anecdotes about John Prescott in his village

In the village of Sutton, which John Prescott called home, everybody has their own anecdote about the Labour heavyweight.For some, it was simply that they had seen him walking his dog, or out and about in his slippers, but others had more colourful stories to tell.At Dresu, a women’s clothes shop, the co-owner Michelle Auker remembers police swarming the village when Greenpeace protesters scaled the roof of Prescott’s family home; her colleague Sam Waud recalls his wife, Pauline, ordering him “naughty” birthday cakes – in the shape of “boobs and stuff” – from Skelton’s cake shop in Hull.Many here will tell you his favourite restaurant was Mr Chu’s on St Andrew’s Quay in Hull, or that he was never absent from the remembrance service in the village.Colin Foulston, 87, enjoying a pint with a friend in the Duke of York pub, said that despite his larger-than-life character, Prescott was quite a private man, and wasn’t often seen out drinking in the village

A picture

Growing up with Nigel Farage: inside Reform UK’s push for the next election

It was the grand finale of Reform UK’s September conference and Nigel Farage had a serious message to deliver: it was time for Reform to “grow up” and professionalise.He couldn’t do it alone, he told 4,000 hyped-up members who had paid £50 each to bask in his presence.“We will not realise our dream unless the people’s army of supporters are organised, unless the people’s army of supporters are helped to professionalise, unless that people’s army fight elections,” he said. “What we have to do is to be credible. What we have to do is to be on the ground everywhere

A picture

UK imposes asset freezes and travel bans on three ‘kleptocrats’

David Lammy, the foreign secretary, claimed he was bringing the “golden age of money laundering” to an end as he announced UK financial sanctions against three high-profile alleged kleptocrats and their key enablers.On Thursday, the Foreign Office (FCDO) announced sanctions including asset freezes and travel bans on Dmitry Firtash, a Ukrainian billionaire, Isabel dos Santos, the daughter of Angola’s former president, and Aivars Lembergs, a Latvian oligarch.The UK has long faced criticism from anti-corruption campaigners for an unquestioning attitude towards foreign investors. That approach came under particular scrutiny after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, when the UK government under the Conservatives belatedly sought to freeze assets belonging to alleged allies of Vladimir Putin.Lammy said the tide was turning on corruption after a long period when the previous government allowed the role of London as a money laundering capital to continue

A picture

John Prescott, British former deputy prime minister, dies aged 86

Politicians of all stripes have lined up to pay tribute to John Prescott, the former British deputy prime minister and stalwart of the New Labour movement, who has died aged 86.Prescott, who had Alzheimer’s, died peacefully in a care home on Thursday morning, according to a statement from his family. He served as deputy prime minister for more than a decade under Tony Blair and played a pivotal role in his government.Blair said Prescott had been “one of the most talented people I ever encountered in politics, one of the most committed and loyal, and definitely the most unusual … There were no rules he really abided by”.During his time in office, Prescott was seen as a custodian of traditional Labour values in the face of a modernising leadership

A picture

It was a time for niceties in the Commons. Kemi doesn’t do niceties | John Crace

It had been shaping up to be another sleepy Thursday in Westminster. A day when hostilities were put on hold after the exertions earlier in the week. A time for MPs to be a little more playful with one another. To even, occasionally, agree with one another.And that’s very much how proceedings began