Why does the US have it in for gig workers?
The US seems to have it in for gig workers and those who use them.California – the fifth-largest economy in the world – has significantly curtailed the ability of companies located there to hire independent contractors and freelancers in lieu of employees.The US Department of Labor has issued updated rules that address worker classifications, which have forced more companies to reclassify their independent contractors as employees in order to be in compliance.New rules from the Internal Revenue Service will now require payment-processing firms to provide additional reporting on the payments made on 1099 forms, the document commonly used to report a freelancer’s earnings.The most recent attack against gig workers comes from the IRS.
This past December, a federal court allowed the agency to go after a digital platform called JustAnswers, which pays freelancing doctors, lawyers and other professionals fees as independent contractors for their expert services on “information requests”,“The gig economy has grown in recent years and, with it, the concern for tax-compliance issues has increased,” said David Hubbert, the deputy assistant attorney general of the justice department’s tax division, in a public statement,“We will use all the tools available to us to ensure that no matter how US taxpayers earn income, they are properly reporting it and paying their taxes,Those who choose to be on the forefront of the gig economy must be aware of, and abide by, all their tax obligations,”Some have wondered: why all the fuss? Why go after these little gig workers instead of billionaire tax dodgers? as one writer points out.
There’s no argument that the gig economy has surged dramatically, particularly since the pandemic.More than 20m new businesses have launched since 2020, the great majority of those representing side hustlers, independent contractors and freelancers.According to data reported in Forbes, an estimated 64 million Americans, representing 38% of the US workforce, did freelance work in 2023, which is up by 4 million people over the previous year, and contributed almost $1.3tn in annual earnings to the US economy.Is the IRS that fearful over the loss of tax revenues? As a business owner, I don’t pay employer taxes when I hire freelancers.
But the freelancer is responsible for paying a “self-employment” tax when they file their tax returns, so if they’re doing what they’re supposed to do, there shouldn’t be much difference.Most states have similar tax arrangements.If a taxpayer fails to report those earnings, then that’s on them.They’re breaking the law and risk penalties or even prison.Some have blamed the big union lobby, which has forced the hand of state and federal legislators into passing new rules forcing companies to reclassify more freelancers as workers in order to make them eligible for union membership.
The supporters of this tactic say that they’re making it possible for independent workers to receive all the rights, protections and privileges of an employee as well as much desired benefits like health insurance and retirement plans,I get it, and let’s be honest,Most business owners I know – myself included – prefer using freelancers as opposed to hiring employees,Why? Because we’re able to hire and fire them as we please and don’t need to worry about things like healthcare, retirement, unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, paid time off and all the other responsibilities that come with having employees,If one of my contractors isn’t doing a good job, I just stop using them.
That’s not so easy when you’ve got employees.Make no mistake – freelancers have fewer protections in the workplace.But this is a two-way street.Most freelancers I know and work with like their independence.The Freelancers Union – which advocates for rights and protections for the freelancing community – has reported that although freelancers “feel anxious about all they have to manage, they also have a better work-life balance with more control over their own destiny and schedule, resulting in less stress and better health” and that “freelancing gives them the flexibility they need because they are unable to work for a traditional employer due to personal circumstances, such as health issues or childcare needs”.
So why all the fuss about freelancers? Why do governments have such a bug up their butts about them?It’s about control,When employees are on the payroll of a company, their information is easily gathered and reported to the government,And if the reporting isn’t done correctly – or at all – the government has an easier target to go after: the employer,Most employers don’t want the cost or pain of having to deal with a government investigation so they comply,And all of their service providers – the accountants, payroll companies and insurance firms – are happy to readily supply whatever information the government needs to make sure that taxes are being collected and rules are being followed rather than losing their license to operate.
But now there are 64 million freelancers out there and there’s no way the IRS or Department of Labor can track their activities.These government agencies can pass all the rules and laws they want.They can make examples of bigger offenders.They can issue public statements and press releases to warn, threaten and scare the Etsy sellers, artists, programmers, graphic designers and photographers into making sure they pay their taxes or else!But government officials don’t want to admit the truth, which is the government is just not able to control this massive group.
Will the bonus bubbly still flow as reality bites for British banks?
The fortunes of Britain’s biggest lenders may well be reflected by a mix of celebratory champagne and commiserative pints by next week, as bankers with an eye on their bonus assess the fallout from a patchy earnings season.Bosses of the UK largest lenders are due to kick off the annual reporting period from Thursday, but their financial performance – and any resulting bonuses – will be overshadowed by corporate shake-ups and job losses.Of the big four bank bosses, NatWest’s Paul Thwaite has one of the easiest jobs ahead. While he is expected to report a 1.8% drop in annual pre-tax profits to £6
Proper care for people who are struggling isn’t ‘soft’ – it saves cash | Phillip Inman
One of the reasons Rachel Reeves wants faster growth is the taxes it generates and the possibility of spending them to refurbish the public sector.It’s troubling that, seven months on from last July’s election victory, Labour is still struggling to piece together a coherent answer to the question: where should the government direct its limited funds to spur a surge in growth?Physical assets, such as renewable energy projects, railways and health centres, are sensible destinations. Ministers are also rightly focused on improving skills and education.No doubt these traditional routes for public investment in the hope of higher growth will be the basis of the chancellor’s budgeting ahead of June’s comprehensive spending review (CSR).But what if the government’s investment portfolio included funding for a holistic approach to helping the near-400,000 people in Britain struggling to cope with life – those with three or more identifiable and acute problems who live from one benefit cheque to the next?The extra expenditure could also target the million-plus people who have applied to see a therapist as part of the NHS Talking Therapies programme and have yet to start their first session
How some objects can have a mind of their own | Brief letters
I have great empathy with Adrian Chiles’ protectiveness of inanimate objects (Why am I so sad about seeing a robot get beaten up?, 5 February), but these objects can exercise tyranny, so we should beware the jacket that won’t let you put it on, the paper serviette that it is impervious to fluid and, of course, any self-hiding object.Jonathan HauxwellCrosshills, North Yorkshire If President Trump thinks that it is reasonable to relocate 2 million people from the Gaza Strip in the interests of peace (Report, 6 February), presumably the same logic should apply to the 500,000 Jewish settlers illegally occupying lands in the Palestinian West Bank.Ian MartinFalmouth, Cornwall If Donald Trump Jr decided to eat the rare duck he’s alleged to have shot in the Venice lagoon (Report, 5 February), would he get the orange sauce from his dad?David ProtheroHarlington, Bedfordshire When did laundry become the word for getting clothes at home clean (Pass notes, 5 February)? I still do the washing.Janet MansfieldAspatria, Cumbria A case of cutting his nose off despite his face (Makeup artist tried to remove Adrien Brody’s nose by mistake on set of The Brutalist, 6 February).Steve BarnesLondon Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section
Trump’s meme coin sparks more than 700 copycats posing as official crypto
Despite once calling cryptocurrency “a scam”, Donald Trump made a theoretical fortune of billions after launching a self-named and highly controversial meme coin immediately before his second inauguration in January.Now an army of digital imposters is trying to cash in on the president’s name and online presence to make their own crypto killing, according to a report in the Financial Times that details hundreds of “copycat and spam coins” uploaded to Trump’s official wallet in cyberspace.Creators sent more than 700 new meme coins to the wallet in recent weeks, many named after Trump or his family members – but none of them have any formal connection.Experts say speculators can be easily duped by names that make it seem the fake coins are allied to the real $Trump cryptocurrency – which itself has seen a precipitous collapse in value – and risk the digital equivalent of being taken to the cleaners.Eswar Prasad, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and an economics professor at Cornell University, told the FT that by launching his own coin, Trump had “opened the floodgates to deception … and at a minimum to rampant speculation”
England stun France as dramatic late Daly try clinches Six Nations classic
Another Saturday night at the movies with a stunningly different conclusion. This was an absolute thriller that kept everyone guessing right up to the final reel. The clincher, in the end, was a sensational 79th minute try from replacement Elliot Daly, bursting unstoppably on to a short ball from his new young fly-half Fin Smith, to trigger delirium around the old cabbage patch.It had seemed for all the world England were about to lose another tight game when France’s precocious winger Louis Bielle-Biarrey went over for his second try of the game six minutes from time. With barely 90 seconds left, though, England had one last chance and, in a set strike move off a lineout, Smith and Daly combined to propel Red Rose fans into dreamland
Trump at the Super Bowl: how the NFL’s culture war ended in surrender
Trump’s attendance at the Super Bowl on Sunday in New Orleans stands to offer more evidence that the sporting climate has shifted from resistance to acceptanceAs a 2016 presidential candidate and White House occupant, Donald Trump lambasted NFL players for kneeling during the national anthem in protest at civil rights abuses. Now, set to become the first incumbent president to attend a Super Bowl, it appears that the US’s most popular sport is genuflecting before him.Trump will reportedly attend the clash between the Kansas City Chiefs and Philadelphia Eagles on Sunday in New Orleans as a guest of Gayle Benson, the owner of the New Orleans Saints. A pre-recorded interview conducted by a Fox News anchor will also air during the pre-game show of an event that last year was viewed by more than 123m Americans. And while he watches the action, Trump will not have to stare at a message inspired by the kind of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) strategies that he is intent on bulldozing
Gatland has sympathy for nation’s frustration as sorry Wales slump again
Italy beat the deluge and condemn toothless Wales to 14th defeat in a row
‘Almost Andy’: how one fan benefited most from the Chiefs’ winning run
Sri Lanka v Australia: second men’s cricket Test, day three – as it happened
Super Bowl repeat or revenge? Whatever happens, history will be made
Bright lights of Las Vegas cannot dim the dark clouds over Super League