The Guide #165: How Paddington affected a quiet takeover of the cultural landscape
Like an awful lot of people, I went to see Paddington in Peru this weekend and – anaemic reviews be damned! – I had a pretty good time.Paddington’s third outing is definitely a drop off from the first two (though those, especially the second, set an almost impossibly high bar).It missed the lightness of touch of director Paul King, who just has a writing credit this time around.The jokes weren’t quite as precise, the baddies not quite as memorable, and the plot – involving ancient Peruvian relics, magic bracelets and steamboat captains haunted by the failures of their ancestors – felt a little convoluted.Still, it was preferable to the E-number waterboarding that watching most children’s films feels like.
The film is bright-eyed, inventive, charitable – and is about something, gently probing at the idea of what constitutes “home” for people who have migrated.The franchise seems to be settling into a comfortable, family friendly middle-agedness – there will probably be at least another three of four instalments, and we’ll soon struggle to find much to say about them.But Paddington Bear, the 21st-century juggernaut – well, there is tons to say about that.Can you think of a bigger revival in fortunes for a cultural creation? Barbie, perhaps – though she already had a level of cultural ubiquity that Paddington, unchanged since 1958 in his duffel coat and floppy, oversized proto-bucket hat, didn’t.When I was little, while not quite a Peruvian relic, Paddington certainly felt a bit fusty.
Michael Bond’s series of books already belonged a very different, more patrician Britain.And, though charming, the stop-motion 70s BBC adaptation, with its little felt puppet moving jerkily along in front of cardboard cut-outs, seemed wildly out of step with the bright, loud, violent US cartoons that had started to smash their way on to British TV in the mid-80s.Compared with the steroidal antics of the Teenage Mutant Hero Turtles (as they were forced to be called over here), Paddington seemed very quaint.Of course, that was his secret weapon all along.For the first Paddington film, in 2014, King and co-writer Hamish McColl spotlighted the same qualities that made Paddington feel dated three decades before.
It leaned into the idea of the kind, articulate, unfailingly polite (well, in everything bar table manners) Paddington Bear as a refugee, not just from South America but from a previous, more genteel age.The films are consumed with nostalgia for a half-forgotten London, of umbrella shops and townhouses, but it’s also a world that feels breezily, multiculturally modern.The branding behemoth that has clanked into gear alongside the films has been entirely predictable, but still it has been eye-popping in scale.Paddington has been a stuffed toy staple for 50 years (invented, as this great Esquire deep dive into Paddington’s history recounts, by none other than Jeremy Clarkson’s mum) but the production line has been supercharged of late.Collaborations and pop-up shops abound, from London to Lima.
An inevitable Paddington musical is due in the West End next year, preceded by that 2020s must-have: the immersive experience production.If this commercial onslaught has been relentless, there has at least been some restraint in what is being hawked: the Bond family have always been pretty careful custodians of their “IP” and the tie-ins haven’t messed with the spirit of the bear too much.But Paddington’s ever-presence isn’t just a matter of pounds and pence.There’s a cultural omnipresence too.That was of course supercharged by his sweet, slightly stilted video with the Queen for the Platinum jubilee, which became something far stranger after her death: the memes of him seeing her off into the afterlife, the giant mounds of blank-expressioned bears piled up outside Buckingham Palace, the growing idea of Paddington as the Ferryman, as death himself.
Despite being everywhere, Paddington has managed to just about sidestep the culture wars (bar a recent flashpoint over the crass Home Office publicity stunt of granting him a British passport).Instead, people feel able to project their political fantasies on to him: those of a liberal bent cling to the bear as a symbol of migration in a world turning ever more hostile to refugees; conservatives, who initially denounced the first film as “anti-Ukip propaganda”, can, post Queen vid, paint him as an icon of traditionalism and a figure of the establishment.(Certainly the UK government are well aware of Paddington’s soft power.)There is of course a third group: those who find the idea of projecting complex, real-world politics on to a kids’ bedtime story facile, not to mention insulting to actual migrants.But even they, in their vocal disdain on social media, only help to contribute to the Paddington supremacy.
Sign up to The GuideGet our weekly pop culture email, free in your inbox every Fridayafter newsletter promotionThis may have a shelf life.Maybe we’re already seeing the beginnings of the Keep Calm and Carry On tea towel-ification of Bond’s creation.People might soon tire of all Paddington, all the time.Perhaps he’ll return to his former status as a fusty, mid-century character, passed over for louder, shinier creations.But not any time soon.
This article was amended on 17 November 2024.An earlier caption on the embedded image said it showed Jim Broadbent as Mr Gruber when it showed Hugh Bonneville who plays Mr Brown.
US justice department plans to push Google to sell off Chrome browser
US justice department officials plan to ask a judge to force Google to sell off its Chrome browser to dismantle the monopoly it has over the internet search market, in a major intervention against one of the world’s biggest tech companies.The Department of Justice (DoJ) last month filed court papers saying it was considering enforcing “structural remedies” to prevent Google from using some its products.The DoJ will reportedly push for Google, which is owned by Alphabet, to sell the browser and also ask a judge to require new measures related to artificial intelligence as well as its Android smartphone operating system, according to Bloomberg.Competition officials, along with a number of US states that have joined the case against the Silicon Valley company, also plan to recommend that the federal judge Amit Mehta imposes data licensing requirements.Google has said it will challenge any case by the DoJ and said the proposals marked an “overreach” by the government that would harm consumers
TechScape: Betting markets come for everything – and the FBI comes for a betting market
Gambling on the outcome of the presidential election became legal in the US at the start of October after decades of prohibition, becoming a new type of pre-election poll. Online prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket accepted billions of dollars in wagers on the outcome, with their users favoring Donald Trump with a 70% chance of beating Kamala Harris, out of sync with mainstream polls. Trump’s camp trumpeted the predictions.In the UK, election gambling is legal and takes a very different form. Traditional bookmakers and betting firms take players’ wagers and set prices and odds
Meta pushes AI bid for UK public sector forward with technology aimed at NHS
Meta’s push to deploy its artificial intelligence system inside Britain’s public sector has taken a step forward after the tech giant awarded development funding to technology aimed at shortening NHS A&E waiting times.Amid rival efforts by Silicon Valley tech companies to work with national and local government, Meta ran its first “hackathon” in Europe asking more than 200 programmers to devise ways to use its Llama AI system in UK public services and, one senior Meta executive said, “focused on the priorities of the Labour party”.The event came after it emerged that Palantir, another US tech company, has been lobbying the Ministry of Justice and government ministers including the chancellor, Rachel Reeves. Microsoft also recently agreed a five-year deal with Whitehall departments to supply its AI Copilot technology to civil servants.Meta’s hackathon was addressed by Nick Clegg, the former deputy prime minister and now Meta’s president of global affairs based in California
AI cloning of celebrity voices outpacing the law, experts warn
It’s the new badge of celebrity status that nobody wants. Jennifer Aniston, Oprah Winfrey and Kylie Jenner have all had their voices cloned by fraudsters. Online blaggers used artificial intelligence to fake the Tiggerish tones of Martin Lewis, the TV financial adviser. And this weekend David Attenborough described himself as “profoundly disturbed” to have discovered that his cloned voice had been used to deliver partisan US news bulletins.Now experts have warned that voice-cloning is outpacing the law as technologists hone previously clunky voice generators into models capable of emulating the subtlest pauses and breathing of human intonation
Roblox to give parents more control over children’s activity after warnings over grooming
The fast-growing children’s gaming platform Roblox is to hand parents greater oversight of their children’s activity and restrict the youngest users from the more violent, crude and scary content after warnings about child grooming, exploitation and sharing of indecent images.From Monday, Roblox will grant parents access to a dashboard on their own phone showing who their child is interacting with, how long they are spending on Roblox each day and to make sure they are accurately recording their age.It will also restrict users under nine to games rated “mild”, with access to “moderate” content allowed only with parental approval. Mild content might involve “unrealistic blood or unrealistic violence” whereas the blood would look realistic for moderate violence.Preteens will also be blocked from chat functions outside of games as part of a worldwide tightening of the rules on the most visited online destination among British eight- to 12-year-olds after Google, Meta’s Instagram and Facebook, and TikTok
AI could cause ‘social ruptures’ between people who disagree on its sentience
Significant “social ruptures” between people who think artificial intelligence systems are conscious and those who insist the technology feels nothing are looming, a leading philosopher has said.The comments, from Jonathan Birch, a professor of philosophy at the London School of Economics, come as governments prepare to gather this week in San Francisco to accelerate the creation of guardrails to tackle the most severe risks of AI.Last week, a transatlantic group of academics predicted that the dawn of consciousness in AI systems is likely by 2035 and one has now said this could result in “subcultures that view each other as making huge mistakes” about whether computer programmes are owed similar welfare rights as humans or animals.Birch said he was “worried about major societal splits”, as people differ over whether AI systems are actually capable of feelings such as pain and joy.The debate about the consequence of sentience in AI has echoes of science fiction films, such as Steven Spielberg’s AI (2001) and Spike Jonze’s Her (2013), in which humans grapple with the feeling of AIs
‘No intention of stopping’: meet the F1 mechanic set for 600th race
Farewell, Rafael Nadal: it was my pleasure to know one of sport’s most gracious champions | Kevin Mitchell
The Spin | A decade after Phillip Hughes’ tragic death: how much has cricket changed?
Counties warned to spend ringfenced cash on women’s cricket or risk losing it
Fanduel network shows an industry bought and paid for by gambling
NFL offenses are struggling on two-point conversions. No one knows why