The Guide #156: Why ER still gets my heart racing

September132024

This week I’ve spent a good chunk of my downtime rewatching Industry, BBC and HBO’s high-tension, high-finance drama, which returns for a third series in the UK on 1 October (American viewers are already charging through it),Watching it a second time, is just as intense as a first: the pace, the jargon-filled crosstalk, the queasy, quick-cut camerawork … I’ve never had a speedball, but this seems like the televisual approximation of what taking one might feel like,Another show I’ve been revisiting this week is ER,Not, alas, because there’s another season coming but because the medical drama celebrates its 30th birthday this month, and that seemed excuse enough to dive back in,And, rewatching the first series, what struck me was just how much like Industry it seemed.

ER still goes hard, each episode rattling along like a gurney down a hospital corridor.It’s remarkable to watch, Steadicams swooping in and around its harried doctors, nurses and surgeons.Its verité visual style continues to be mimicked across TV.And the show is thick with detail: not just in the density of the medical language, but also in the sheer number of plotlines being juggled in each episode.That was something that bewildered many viewers and critics in 1994, but the willingness to zip between stories seems a lot more suited to our attention-deficit age.

For all the 90s-ness of the thing – the references, the decor, the clothing, the pea-soupy picture quality – the show still feels thrillingly modern.ER’s relative sprightliness got me thinking about how TV shows age, or not.How many times have you watched a show from the not-so-distant past, even a show that you enjoyed first time around, and thought, “Wow, this looks dated”? It happens to me quite a bit and it’s not always simply down to a show’s age.When we talk of things being “dated”, we often mean in material terms: it’s easy to mock a show for its outmoded fashions or technology.More interesting, I think, is when a show feels dated because of how it tells a story or even what story it tells.

Take Cheers,It’s a show that ended just a year before ER started, but seems beamed in from another century,I should note that I love Cheers, a show that represents a high-water mark for the sitcom with compelling characters, beautifully constructed jokes and that feeling of warm, enveloping familiarity that all the best sitcoms should have,That said, have you watched it lately?! It feels static and stagey, closer to a Victorian drawing room comedy than the quick-cutting single-cam sitcoms of today,On the other hand, Friends, Cheers’s sitcom successor on US network NBC, seems to have somehow avoided the ageing process as well as its regular guest star Paul Rudd (a few unfortunate elements aside), and it’s watched as avidly by gen Z as by its original audience.

Friends’s agelessness might have something to do with its studied inoffensiveness: it largely avoided any sort of real specificity, conjuring up a fantasy version of New York that bears little relation to what was actually going on in the city (ballooning rents, Rudy Giuliani’s crime crackdown and, of course, 9/11) at the time it aired – allowing different generations and demographics to project themselves on to it,In fact, being of the moment is often what dooms TV to seeming dated further down the line,I recently revisited Nathan Barley – Charlie Brooker and Chris Morris’s bracing 2005 satire on the creeping hipsterisation of east London – expecting it to feel completely fresh,After all, this was the show considered ahead of its time, “a documentary about the future” as a Guardian 10th anniversary piece noting its prescience put it,Yet another 10 years on from that piece, Brooker and Morris’s show (pictured above), while still extremely funny, seems, to my eyes at least, strangely outmoded in look – hot-pink patterned T-shirts and angular haircuts – and feel.

Watching it is like viewing Pathé footage of a war that’s long since ended – in this case, against the shallow provocation of early hipsterdom.It’s essentially one long screed against the gleeful offensiveness of 00s-era Vice magazine and its acolytes.That was a battle worth fighting at the time, but it feels a little out of step with today’s more cautious mood, when gleeful offensiveness is somewhat rarer on the ground.In truth, it’s a little unfair to hold past generations’ shows to today’s standards.After all, they were being made for their own time, not for the approval of some future audience.

The advent of streaming has meant that, where once you would have had to seek out older programmes on VHS and DVD, now you can stumble upon them, nestled alongside newer series,And let’s remember that a lot of the shows mentioned here have stood the test of time, by virtue of the fact that we’re still watching them: the shows that feel truly outdated, or even downright offensive (see about 50% of all British sitcoms made in the 1970s), are unlikely to ever resurface on iPlayer or Netflix at all,Sign up to The GuideGet our weekly pop culture email, free in your inbox every Fridayafter newsletter promotionIt will be interesting to see how a show like Industry dates or doesn’t date, though,It’s a show that is happy to tackle of-the-moment topics: unlike other series (notably Succession) it knitted the pandemic and its after-effects into its second series, and its third series will tackle how business is embracing – or pretending to embrace – green energy and environmental, social and governance principles,For contemporary audiences, this patina of realness is part of what makes Industry so compelling, but that same quality may be what makes it feel out of step in the future.

Or maybe not.Maybe, like ER, it will still give that gurney down the hallway rush.If you want to read the complete version of this newsletter please subscribe to receive The Guide in your inbox every Friday.

technologySee all

Google Pixel 9 review: a good phone overshadowed by great ones

Google’s cheapest Pixel 9 offers almost everything that makes its top-flight sibling one of the best smaller phones available, cutting a few key ingredients to price match Apple and Samsung.The Guardian’s journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.The Pixel 9 costs £799 (€899/$799/A$1,349) shaving £200 off the asking price of the stellar Pixel 9 Pro while sitting above the excellent value sub-£500 Pixel 8a from May

September192024

British MPs and international organisations hacked on X

British politicians and international organisations have had their accounts on X hacked on Wednesday night.MPs including Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, and the Labour MPs Chris Elmore and Carolyn Harris all shared the same message on the social media site. Although quickly removed, the messages could still be read on TweetDeck, a dashboard used to manage accounts on X, formerly Twitter.The messages, which also included a lengthy code, said: “THIS IS HACKED ACCOUNT!!!! INTRODUCING HACKED ON SOLANA on each account we hack we publish the token address so we pump it and make profits together.”The message on the justice secretary’s account was posted at 7

September182024

All 23andMe board members but CEO resign over no adequate buyout offers

Seven of eight members of 23andMe’s board have resigned in yet another blow to the struggling genetics company. The CEO is now the only remaining member.The independent directors of the genetic testing firm said in a letter posted Tuesday that they were quitting the company’s board after not receiving a satisfactory buyout offer from the CEO, Anne Wojcicki.“After months of work, we have yet to receive from you a fully financed, fully diligenced, actionable proposal that is in the best interests of the non-affiliated shareholders,” said the seven directors, including the CEO of YouTube, in a letter to the company’s co-founder and CEO.In a memo to employees reported by the Wall Street Journal, Wojcicki responded: “I am surprised and disappointed by the decision of the directors to resign

September182024

Albanese government forging ahead with social media age restrictions despite Meta’s new Instagram teen accounts

The Albanese government is forging ahead with its plans for an age restriction on social media despite Meta announcing new restrictions for teens on Instagram, with the communications minister arguing children’s use of social media is unbalanced.On Wednesday Instagram announced changes to teen accounts, including giving parents the ability to set daily time limits for using the app, block teens from using Instagram at certain times and to see accounts their child is exchanging messages with and the content categories they are viewing.Teens under the age of 16 will need parental permission before any of the settings can be changed. Meta said the move had been planned for months, but the announcement came a week after the federal government announced plans to introduce legislation to parliament, by the end of the year, to raise the age children can access social media up to an as-yet-undefined age – likely between 14 and 16.The communications minister, Michelle Rowland, said the government welcomed the announcement, but “it does not negate the government’s intention to introduce legislation this year to mandate a minimum age for access to social media

September182024

Meta to put under-18 Instagram users into new ‘teen accounts’

Meta is putting Instagram users under the age of 18 into new “teen accounts” to allow parents greater control over their activities, including the ability to block children from viewing the app at night.The change will apply to new teen users but will also be extended to existing accounts held by teenagers over the next few months.Changes under the teen account setting include giving parents the ability to set daily time limits for using the app, block teens from using Instagram at certain times, see the accounts their child is exchanging messages with and being shown the content categories they are viewing.Teenagers signing up to Instagram are already placed by default into the strictest privacy settings, which include barring adults from messaging teens who don’t follow them and muting notifications at night.However, under the new “teen account” feature users under the age of 16 will need parental permission to change those settings, while 16- and 17-year-olds defaulted into the new features will be able to change them independently

September172024

Users of ‘throuples’ dating app Feeld may have had intimate photos accessed

Users of Feeld, a dating app aimed at alternative relationships, could have had sensitive data including messages, private photos and details of their sexuality accessed or even edited, it has emerged, after cybersecurity experts exposed a string of security “vulnerabilities”.Feeld, registered in the UK, reported soaring revenues and profits this month, thanks to millions of downloads from non-monogamous, queer and kinky users across the world.But while the app has gone from strength to strength financially – and attracted plaudits for its approach to sexuality – a British cybersecurity company claims to have uncovered serious failings in Feeld’s systems earlier this year.Feeld said it had dealt with the concerns “as a matter of urgency”, resolved them within two months and that it had not seen any evidence that user data had been breached.It did not know how long the vulnerabilities had existed before it was told about them in March by the London-based cybersecurity firm Fortbridge

September172024

politicsSee all

;