The Guide #173: Why Netflix and Spotify don’t seem to care if we are paying attention

A picture


Over Christmas, two articles were released that felt like harbingers – if not full-on sirens – for the direction of travel of popular culture.There was Will Tavlin’s piece for n+1 about Netflix’s less-than-stellar film output, which was briefly touched on in last week’s newsletter.And in Harpers magazine, there was an extract from music journalist Liz Pelly’s new book on Spotify.It focuses on the streamer’s Perfect Fit Content (PFC) programme, which pays production companies to create cheap, generic music by “ghost artists” in order, Pelly alleges, to populate Spotify’s playlists and reduce royalty payouts to real artists.(In Pelly’s book Spotify acknowledges the existence of the Perfect Fit Content programme but denies that it is trying to increase the share of streams of Perfect Fit Content.

) Both are eye-opening reads, depicting the two companies as industry disruptors with little or no care for the thing they’re disrupting, and making their respective industries worse in the process,But if Netflix and Spotify are cast as the villains of these stories, it is clear that we, the consumers, have a degree of complicity,Both streamers are, after all, simply adapting to, and profiting from, our viewing and listening habits,Two striking details from those articles underline this,Tavlin, in his piece, claims that screenwriters for Netflix movies are being asked by execs to include scenes where characters “announce what they’re doing so that viewers who have this program on in the background can follow along”.

Meanwhile, Pelly notes in her piece that Spotify’s “internal research showed that many users were not coming to the platform to listen to specific artists or albums; they just needed something to serve as a soundtrack for their days, like a study playlist or maybe a dinner soundtrack … listeners often weren’t even aware of what song or artist they were hearing.”If this sense of entertainment being something to pay half attention to while getting on with other, more significant things sounds dispiriting, it’s hardly unprecedented.Such ideas were baked into radio from its earliest days, with the BBC’s Music While You Work serving up light arrangements of popular music standards to boost the morale of factory workers during the second world war.And daytime TV has a long, proud history of chuntering away in the background while housewives or husbands rattle through menial tasks (while researching this piece I discovered a 1996 Guardian article titled The Importance of Ironing to Television).In some cases this TV background babble might even be cast as a social good, offering the sensation of companionship and comfort in an empty house.

In that setting, it doesn’t matter what’s being said, it just matters that it’s on.What feels different about Netflix and Spotify’s alleged approaches though is that they pander to our distracted, half-attentive states rather than try to jolt us out of them.After all, even the cheesiest song on an easy listening radio station is still intended to rise to the foreground, to stir something in the listener, to distract them from whatever they are doing.Not so with Spotify’s Perfect Fit tracks, which like lift music before them, are intended to be as inconspicuous as possible.Likewise, the corniest of daytime soaps is still being made under some assumption that viewers are paying attention to it – or if they’re not, it’s the soap’s job to grab hold of that attention and not let go of it.

But that becomes less necessary when your show is simply designed to be part of a rolling churn of autoplayed content.As Pelly notes: “a model in which the imperative is simply to keep listeners around, whether they’re paying attention or not, distorts our very understanding of music’s purpose” – a point that might just as easily be made about Netflix as well.It’s hard to imagine things getting any better with the advent of AI – which soon will be capable, if it isn’t already, of churning out nondescript tracks, or scripts with plot summaries shoehorned in at algorithmically determined intervals.If there’s room for optimism it’s in the fact that so much of the biggest and best popular culture of the moment demands your full attention.Netflix’s biggest show ever, Squid Game, is a Korean drama that the vast majority of its audience watches with subtitles – hardly conducive to distracted half viewing.

Triumphant in the TV categories at Sunday’s Golden Globes was Shōgun (Anna Sawai, above, won best female actor in a TV show among the series’ other awards), another subtitled show, and one with a complex plot to boot,To top it all, next week brings the much-anticipated return of Severance, a drama that demands you pore over every last shot,And while, Pelly alleges, Spotify’s Perfect Fit content dominates playlists that prioritise ambient or modern classical, other non-instrumental genres and sounds are unlikely to be as shamelessly replicable (I’d like to see them have a go at ripping off, say, Geordie Greep),As ever, the antidote to these dire dystopian developments lies with the artists: if they keep making singular, engrossing stuff, there will always be an audience to lap it up – and not while doing the ironing,Sign up to The GuideGet our weekly pop culture email, free in your inbox every Fridayafter newsletter promotionIf you want to read the complete version of this newsletter please subscribe to receive The Guide in your inbox every Friday
technologySee all
A picture

How to politicize the truth on Facebook, Instagram, and Wikipedia

Hello, and welcome back to TechScape. Last Tuesday, I predicted Meta would enter a new political era after the departure of Nick Clegg. Two hours after I published last week’s newsletter, Mark Zuckerberg declared that the new conservative phase would begin. It was sooner and more brazen than I had expected – and faster-paced. Zuckerberg announced he would disband Meta’s US fact-checking operation because he believes his fact-checkers have been too politically biased

A picture

Google investigated by UK watchdog over search dominance

Google is being investigated by the UK competition watchdog over the impact of its search and advertising practices on consumers, news publishers, businesses and rival search engines.The tech company accounts for more than 90% of general searches in the UK, according to the Competition and Markets Authority.The CMA estimates that search advertising costs the equivalent of nearly £500 for each UK household a year, which could be kept down with effective competition.The watchdog announced on Tuesday it will investigate if Google is blocking competitors from entering the market, and whether it is engaging in “potential exploitative conduct” by the mass collection of consumers’ data without informed consent.It will also investigate whether Google is using its position as the pre-eminent search engine to give an unfair advantage to its own shopping and travel services

A picture

Amazon makes ‘largest ever’ UK order of electric trucks to cut carbon emissions

Amazon is to deploy nearly 150 electric heavy goods vehicles as well as piling packages on to trains and post-style trolleys in an effort to reduce the carbon footprint of delivering goods in the UK.The tech company said it had bought more than 140 electric Mercedes-Benz heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) and eight Volvo lorries – which it says is the UK’s biggest order of electric trucks – that can take loads of up to 40 tonnes.The vehicles will hit the road over the next 18 months, increasing the online retailer’s electric HGV fleet from nine at present.The US-owned company’s switch to electric logistics is partly funded by the government under its zero emission HGV and infrastructure demonstrator programme (ZEHID). Amazon plans to install fast-charging points across its UK network to keep the trucks in action

A picture

Ministers consider ban on all UK public bodies making ransomware payments

Schools, the NHS and local councils will be banned from making ransomware payments under government proposals to tackle hackers.In a crackdown on such cyber-attacks, operators of critical national infrastructure will be barred from bowing to demands when criminal gangs hold IT systems hostage.Payouts by private companies will have to be reported to the government and could be blocked if they are made to sanctioned groups or foreign states. Reporting ransomware attacks will also be made mandatory if the proposals become law.The plans, described by one expert as “the most significant intervention against ransomware by any national government to date”, will bring other public bodies into line with government departments, which are already banned from making payments

A picture

Meta’s ditching of factcheckers is potentially dangerous and a disservice | Letters

Meta’s move to scrap factcheckers is not about “complexity”, as it says (Report, 8 January), but to support Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s agenda.It is widely agreed that effective, fast and unbiased factchecking is essential for the proper functioning of social media platforms. Similarly, principles of free speech are foundational to fostering communication and public debate in a healthy democratic society. Mark Zuckerberg’s announcement that Meta is to follow X in introducing user-generated notes raises serious concerns.The shift will intensify pressures on vulnerable groups, including children, minorities, gender rights advocates and LGBTQ+ communities, who are already targeted by hate speech

A picture

Water shortage fears as Labour’s first AI growth zone sited close to new reservoir

Labour’s first artificial intelligence growth zone will be sited close to the UK’s first new reservoir in 30 years, sparking fears that the AI push will add to the “severe pressure” on water supplies in the area.Keir Starmer announced on Monday that he would hugely increase artificial intelligence capacity and reduce planning restrictions on companies that wanted to build datacentres by setting up “growth zones” with fewer constraints.The first of these will be in Culham, Oxfordshire, only seven miles from a reservoir planned by Thames Water in Abingdon, which was supposed to provide water to people in the severely water-stressed south-east of England. This is the area of the country most at risk of running out of water, according to the Environment Agency. Oxfordshire has faced particular issues, with areas reliant on bottled water during heatwaves