Wes Streeting unveils plans for ‘patient passports’ to hold all medical records

A picture


Wes Streeting is to unveil plans for portable medical records giving every NHS patient all their information stored digitally in one place on Monday, despite fears over breaching privacy and creating a target for hackers.The health secretary is launching a major consultation on the government’s plans to transform the NHS from “analogue to digital” over the next decade.It will offer “patient passports” containing health data that can be swiftly accessed by GPs, hospitals and ambulance services.New laws are also set to be introduced on Wednesday to make patient health records available across all NHS trusts in England.It will speed up patient care, reduce repeat medical tests and minimise medication errors, he said.

The digital data bill will standardise information systems across the NHS, making it possible to share electronic records across all parts of the service, and bringing them together in a single patient record on the NHS app.Streeting moved to allay patients’ fears over “big brother” oversight of private records, telling the Guardian that they would be “protected and anonymised” as the government pursued new technological opportunities.He also defended the government’s plan to transform healthcare in England by working with big tech and pharma companies to develop new treatments, saying he would get the “best possible deal” for the NHS.The health secretary told the Guardian the development “will mean the NHS can work hand in hand with the life sciences sector, offering access to our large and diverse set of data”.He added: “The conversation we’re kicking off today will include questions like how to ensure patients’ data is protected and anonymised – people are up for helping save the NHS, but understandably have concerns about ‘big brother’.

“We will also work through how to get a best possible deal for the NHS in return, whether that’s extra funding, cut-price deals for the latest medicines or priority access, so cutting-edge treatments are available to NHS patients, not just those who can afford to pay.”But medConfidential, a patient privacy campaign group, said Streeting’s plans would unavoidably create a vulnerable database, the contents of which could then be shared with drug companies.Furthermore, records could potentially be viewed by any of the NHS’s 1.5 million staff, even if they are not treating the patient.“Wes Streeting is planning a ’big brother’ database.

Your identifiable medical history and all your medical notes will no longer be looked after by doctors and will be controlled by politicians who will decide who they get sold to – which will inevitably be anyone who’ll pay for them,” said Sam Smith, a spokesperson for the group.He added: “The proposals are a gift to stalkers and creeps who misuse NHS systems to find out the most basic private details that people only tell their doctors, and the government shows no sign of taking the most basic steps to prevent stalkers and creeps getting access.“Your entire medical history will be readable by anyone with access.And these new mega datastores would be at ever-present risk of hacking.”A public consultation, initiated by the last government when it considered a similar move and published in May this year, found that 21% of people polled disagreed with the statement that “I trust the NHS to keep my patient data secure”.

Many more – two-thirds of respondents – said they would not want anyone who is not directly treating them to have access to their medical records,Rosa Curling, the co-executive director of Foxglove, a technology justice campaign group, said: “Opening up NHS data to profit-making companies is a fundamental shift in the critical relationship between patient and doctor, which is based above all on confidentiality and trust,“Such a seismic change cannot be made without a comprehensive plan to gain the consent and trust of patients, especially when anonymisation has been debunked as an effective means of preserving patient privacy,”The public are likely to be sceptical about Streeting’s plans, despite the benefits they are intended to provide in terms of better care,Sign up to First EditionOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersafter newsletter promotionIn the May consultation, large majorities also said they were worried that NHS IT systems could be vulnerable to cyber-attacks (82%) and that the NHS might make mistakes in handling the data (65%).

Half (50%) were slightly or strongly concerned that the health service might sell their personal data to companies without their permission,Of those polled, 69% said they would like to be told if a summary of their GP record is collected nationally, allowing doctors away from home to be able to view their private information,Writing in the Guardian, Streeting said: “The challenges the NHS faces today are huge, but the opportunities are enormous,The revolution taking place today in science and technology will transform the way we receive healthcare,“Nye Bevan would have had no idea in 1948, but the model he created makes the NHS the best-placed healthcare system in the world to take advantage of rapid advances in data, genomics, predictive and preventative medicine.

“It allows us to introduce patient passports, so whether you’re seeing a GP or a hospital surgeon, they have your full medical history.We will be able to judge a child’s risk of disease from birth, so they can take steps to prevent it striking.”Launching a “national conversation” with the public, health workers and experts to help shape the government’s 10-year NHS plan, to be published in spring next year, Streeting said that as well as the digitisation of the NHS, he wanted healthcare to shift from hospitals to the community.As part of that, the government wants new neighbourhood health centres where patients will be able to see family doctors, district nurses, care workers, physiotherapists, health visitors and mental health specialists, all locally and under the same roof.There will also be a third shift in focus, from sickness to prevention, with the aim of shortening the amount of time people spend chronically unwell and preventing ill-health.

Smart watches and wearable tech will be handed to millions of people with diabetes or high blood pressure, so they can monitor their own health at home.The prime minister is expected to accompany Streeting at the launch of the new online platform at a London health centre on Monday.Keir Starmer said of the consultation: “We have a clear plan to fix the health service, but it’s only right that we hear from the people who rely on the NHS every day to have their say and shape our plan as we deliver it.“Together we can build a healthcare system that puts patients first and delivers the care that everyone deserves.“We have a huge opportunity to put the NHS back on its feet.

So, let’s be the generation that took the NHS from the worst crisis in its history and made it fit for the future.”
technologySee all
A picture

As Silicon Valley eyes US election, beware Elon Musk and the tech bros with political nous | John Naughton

Way back in the 1960s “the personal is political” was a powerful slogan capturing the reality of power dynamics within marriages. Today, an equally meaningful slogan might be that “the technological is political”, to reflect the way that a small number of global corporations have acquired political clout within liberal democracies. If anyone doubted that, then the recent appearance of Elon Musk alongside Donald Trump at a rally in Pennsylvania provided useful confirmation of how technology has moved centre-stage in American politics. Musk may be a manchild with a bad tweeting habit, but he also owns the company that is providing internet connectivity to Ukrainian troops on the battlefield; and his rocket has been chosen by Nasa to be the vehicle to land the next Americans on the moon.Sign up to ObservedAnalysis and opinion on the week's news and culture brought to you by the best Observer writers after newsletter promotionThere was a time when the tech industry wasn’t much interested in politics

A picture

Quit if you don’t like our office-working policy, Amazon executive suggests

A senior Amazon executive has suggested that staff who do not like the company’s new five-days-a-week office-working policy should quit.The head of the tech company’s cloud computing business told an internal meeting that if employees did not support the change they could look for a job elsewhere, according to a transcript reviewed by Reuters.Matt Garman, the chief executive of the Amazon Web Services (AWS) unit, said nine out of 10 workers he had spoken to supported the policy, which is effective for all office-based staff from 2 January, barring those with exceptional circumstances.He indicated that anyone unhappy with the retreat from home-working should leave. “If there are people who just don’t work well in that environment and don’t want to, that’s OK, there are other companies around,” said Garman, in the comments reported by Reuters

A picture

AI-generated child sexual abuse imagery reaching ‘tipping point’, says watchdog

Child sexual abuse imagery generated by artificial intelligence tools is becoming more prevalent on the open web and reaching a “tipping point”, according to a safety watchdog.The Internet Watch Foundation said the amount of AI-made illegal content it had seen online over the past six months had already exceeded the total for the previous year.The organisation, which runs a UK hotline but also has a global remit, said almost all the content was found on publicly available areas of the internet and not on the dark web, which must be accessed by specialised browsers.The IWF’s interim chief executive, Derek Ray-Hill, said the level of sophistication in the images indicated that the AI tools used had been trained on images and videos of real victims. “Recent months show that this problem is not going away and is in fact getting worse,” he said

A picture

AI mediation tool may help reduce culture war rifts, say researchers

Artificial intelligence could help reduce some of the most contentious culture war divisions through a mediation process, researchers claim.Experts say a system that can create group statements that reflect majority and minority views is able to help people find common ground.Prof Chris Summerfield, a co-author of the research from the University of Oxford, who worked at Google DeepMind at the time the study was conducted, said the AI tool could have multiple purposes.“What I would like to see it used for is to give political leaders in the UK a better sense of what people in the UK really think,” he said, noting surveys gave only limited insights, while forums known as citizens’ assemblies were often costly, logistically challenging and restricted in size.Writing in the journal Science, Summerfield and colleagues from Google DeepMind report how they built the “Habermas Machine” – an AI system named after the German philosopher Jürgen Habermas

A picture

Watchdog opens investigation into anti-immigrant posts on Facebook

Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta must answer “serious questions” about its handling of anti-immigration material, according to the company’s content watchdog, as it opened an investigation into two Facebook posts.The Oversight Board is investigating Meta’s decision to keep the posts online after acknowledging that it receives a significant number of complaints from users over content that shares anti-immigrant views.Helle Thorning-Schmidt, co-chair of the board and a former Danish prime minister, said it was “critical” to get the balance right between free speech and protection of vulnerable groups.“The high number of appeals we get on immigration-related content from across the EU tells us there are serious questions to ask about how the company handles issues related to this, including the use of coded speech,” she said in a statement.The first case being investigated by the board is focused on a meme posted by the administrator of a Facebook page that describes itself as the official account of Poland’s far-right coalition party Confederation

A picture

Meta fires staff for ‘using free meal vouchers to buy household goods’

Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, has reportedly fired about 24 staff at its Los Angeles offices for using their $25 (£19) meal credits to buy items such as toothpaste, laundry detergent and wine glasses.The tech firm, which is worth £1.2tn and also owns the messaging platform WhatsApp, is said to have dismissed workers last week after an investigation discovered staff had been abusing the system, including sending food home when they were not in the office.That included one unnamed worker on a $400,000 salary, who said they had used their meal credits to buy household goods and groceries such as toothpaste and tea.On the anonymous messaging platform Blind, they wrote: “On days where I would not be eating at the office, like if my husband was cooking or if I was grabbing dinner with friends, I figured I ought not to waste the dinner credit