Betting giants spared regulatory action after secret deals with watchdog
Betting firms have been reaching secret deals with Britain’s gambling watchdog, including surrendering revenues for failings that are kept out of the public domain, the Observer can reveal,The Gambling Commission has been placing some betting firms into special measures, enabling them to avoid formal action, which can include fines or the revoking of a licence,If a company agrees to implement an action plan and “divest any profit” from regulatory failures, the regulator typically does not make its failings public,Campaigners say the regime has been a “protective bubble” for firms that may put gamblers at risk of harm,The watchdog’s supervision of betting brands is under scrutiny as it faces a legal claim filed in the high court last week by Annie Ashton, whose husband, Luke, took his life after becoming addicted to gambling.
An inquest highlighted failings by the brand Betfair, which had failed to flag Luke Ashton as a problem gambler,Betfair had been in special measures at the time of Ashton’s death in April 2021, but this was only disclosed by the Gambling Commission after Ashton’s inquest had concluded, in 2023,Betfair’s failings had included inadequate identification of customers at risk of gambling harm,It also emerged that Betfair had voluntarily divested £635,123 to charities to reduce gambling harms, as well as agreeing an improvement plan – allowing it to avoid formal regulatory action,This weekend, Annie Ashton called for the regulator to publish the number of firms it has put into special measures, the names of firms and the revenues surrendered.
“This information should be public knowledge and it should be scrutinised,” she said.“In Luke’s case, we now know Betfair was in special measures and the regulator should have been looking at them with even more scrutiny.Someone died under their watch.“The whole situation with Luke was completely avoidable when you start unpicking what happened.You start to see these errors allowing for deaths to occur and lessons are not being learned at all.
”Contacted by the Observer last week, the Gambling Commission said it was unable to provide figures on the number of firms put into special measures in the last three years, or industry revenues surrendered for failings.It has previously refused a freedom of information request to identify the firms, saying it could jeopardise the willingness of companies to provide information on a voluntary basis.Dan Webster, a solicitor at Leigh Day representing Annie Ashton, said: “It’s disturbing that gamblers can be using platforms but are not aware [the platforms] have been identified by the commission as failing to comply with standards which are in place to keep people safe.”The inquest into Luke Ashton’s death found that gambling disorder was a contributory cause of death.A prevention of future deaths report issued by the coroner said Ashton had been assessed as “low risk” by Betfair and its algorithm to monitor gambling had failed to flag him as a problem gambler.
The deposits and losses made by Ashton were most intensive in the weeks leading up to his death, but he was only sent automated “safer gambling” emails without a personal intervention,The firm was effectively rewarding Ashton for his increased gambling activity, with increased bonuses and free bets, according to the legal team representing his wife,Richard Clarke, a managing director at Flutter UK and Ireland, the parent company of Betfair, told the inquest in June 2023 it had been a tragic outcome, but that the brand was confident it had met the regulatory standards at the time,The firm did not disclose during the hearing that it had been in special measures at the time of Ashton’s death,In its response to the prevention of future deaths report after Ashton’s inquest, the Gambling Commission disclosed it had conducted an assessment in December 2020 of brands within the Flutter group, including Betfair, four months before Ashton’s death.
The brand was placed in special measures after the assessment indicated “there were failings in the process for identifying potential harm and interacting with customers”,Betfair was removed from special measures in June 2021,The commission was informed of Ashton’s death in July 2021, but considered the activity on his account was prior to the completion of the special measures process, and it would “not be appropriate” to take regulatory action,In November last year, the watchdog reiterated its decision that it would not subject Betfair to a formal regulatory investigation, despite questions over the timing and effectiveness of the changes made by the firm while in special measures,Annie Ashton’s claim in the high court for a judicial review seeks to overturn the watchdog’s decision not to launch a regulatory investigation into Betfair over Ashton’s death.
The claim states: “There exist real concerns that the defendant [the Gambling Commission] is failing adequately to regulate operators in order to protect people from gambling-related harm, particularly in the most serious cases where individuals have died and where there is concern that operator conduct has played a role.”Sign up to ObservedAnalysis and opinion on the week's news and culture brought to you by the best Observer writers after newsletter promotionThe Gambling Commission introduced its special measures regime in September 2020, under which firms can submit and agree an urgent action plan to rectify regulatory failings.Officials say the watchdog’s special measures policy is a helpful tool, giving betting brands the chance to rapidly rectify regulatory failings in advance of formal action.Firms can “offer to divest any profits made from non-compliance”, with the proceeds going to good causes.Special measures should only be implemented where “there is no or limited risk of consumer harm”, there is not a history of protracted non-compliance, and there is an acceptance of failings.
A spokesperson for the regulator said: “The Gambling Commission does not automatically publish the outcomes of special measures activities given they are designed to give effect to swifter action on the part of the operator short of exercising formal regulatory powers.“Most regulators have a range of different interventions they can make, and also a threshold below which they do not routinely publicise interventions they may have made.The Gambling Commission has consistently published enforcement outcomes and there is a register available detailing these actions.“We extend our sincere condolences to the family and friends of Luke Ashton.In line with our statutory duties as the gambling regulator we will continue to take appropriate enforcement action where needed.
The Commission’s formal regulatory powers remain in place.”A Betfair spokesperson said: “We hold ourselves to the highest standards in the industry and we reiterate our sincere condolences to Mrs Ashton and her family over this tragic case.We have made a number of improvements to our player protections since early 2021.“Unfortunately, due to live legal proceedings we are unable to comment any further at this time.”Webster from Leigh Day said he was not convinced the industry had made sufficient changes to prevent further harm to people who are at risk but not identified as vulnerable gamblers.
Annie Ashton has also separately launched a negligence claim against Flutter over her husband’s death,The firm is defending the claim, denying any breach of duties,Webster said: “We’re not satisfied, based on the evidence heard at the inquest and information obtained subsequently, that any changes made by Betfair are sufficient to ensure that something like what happened to Luke won’t happen again in future,”
Strong wage growth gives Bank of England interest rate dilemma
There was a brief period when the Bank of England was poised to cut interest rates and cut them quickly. Official figures showing strong wage growth appear to have ruled that out, at least for the time being.That is because policymakers at the central bank are likely to consider persistently high pay rises as inflationary. With prices already on track to edge up this year in response to elevated energy prices, only one or two quarter-point reductions in the cost of borrowing are possible without letting inflation jump even higher.There is always an element of doubt about the labour market figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS), which have taken a battering from MPs concerned about their accuracy after a drop-off in survey respondents
Europe’s seaborne imports of gas fall by fifth to lowest since 2021, report finds
European imports of seaborne gas shipments fell by a fifth last year to their lowest level since the pandemic, according to a new report, while the UK’s plunged by nearly a half, but governments are continuing to spend billions on new import terminals.The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) found that Europe’s imports of liquefied natural gas, known as LNG, fell by 19% last year to lows not seen since 2021 as governments worked to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy.However, a wave of fresh investments in new LNG import infrastructure after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has moved ahead, which could mean that infrastructure worth billions will sit idle in the years to come, the institute warned.The findings are also likely to spark debate in the UK over the need for investment in new North Sea oil and gas projects and gas storage facilities. The report found that the UK recorded the steepest drop in LNG imports last year – a fall of 47% compared with the year before – after its gas demand fell to a record low
‘We must avoid a chilling effect’: the CMA chief on the UK’s pro-growth shift
Signs by the lifts in the Canary Wharf headquarters of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) remind staff not to talk about their work in public, given the billions of pounds resting on its decisions.But a very public debate is taking place about how the competition watchdog works and is run, with the Labour government determined to make an example of it.In October the prime minister rebuked regulators in front of global business leaders for “needlessly holding back the investment we need to take our country forward”.In January they were hauled into 10 to explain how they would support the government’s growth ambitions.Then days later, the government defenestrated the CMA’s chair, Marcus Bokkerink, replacing him with the former head of Amazon in the UK, Doug Gurr
Support for ESG proposals at record low driven by US investors, report shows
Support for shareholder proposals aimed at tackling environmental and social risks hit a record low last year, figures show, amid a “worrying retreat” by investors, particularly in the US.A report compiled by the responsible investment campaign group ShareAction found that, out of 279 environmental, social and governance (ESG) shareholder resolutions put forward at annual general meetings last year in the UK, Europe and the US, only four – or 1.4% – secured majority support.It marks a sharp decline from recent years, having dropped from 21% in 2021 to 14% in 2022, and 3% in 2023. However, it also reflects a severe drop in support for ESG issues in the US, where rightwing activists and politicians have targeted financial firms for supporting climate and diversity policies
European defence stocks rise by €18bn to record high ahead of Ukraine peace talks – as it happened
More than £10bn has been added to the value of Europe’s defence industry today, as investors anticipate a surge in military spending.Weapons makers are leading the risers on many of Europe’s stock exchanges today, as leaders from major European powers prepared to meet in Paris for emergency talks on the Ukraine war.Last week’s shock move by the US to sideline Kyiv and its European backers from peace negotiations has prompted expectations that Europe must spend more on defence.Before today’s summit Ursula von der Leyen said the issue was “about Ukraine – but also about us. We need an urgency mindset
Supreme court judges reject Reeves’ motor finance intervention
Rachel Reeves was dealt a fresh blow on Monday when her attempt to intervene in a high-profile supreme court case and curb a potential £44bn bill for lenders caught up in the car loan commissions scandal was rejected.Judges at the supreme court rejected the chancellor’s application, lodged last month, in which she urged them to avoid handing “windfall” compensation to borrowers harmed by allegedly secret commission payouts to car dealers that arranged the loans.The news weighed on lenders’ share prices, which had soared after the Treasury’s intervention amid hopes that it would reduce their potential compensation bill. Shares in Lloyds and Close Brothers, two of the biggest providers of motor finance in the UK, fell as much as 3.8% and 8
Protesters target Tesla showrooms in US over Elon Musk’s government cost-cutting
Amazon accused of targeting Coventry union members after failed recognition vote
Elon Musk’s mass government cuts could make private companies millions
If the AI Roundheads go to war with tech royalty, don’t bet against them | John Naughton
Tell us: how has artificial intelligence affected your work?
Global disunity, energy concerns and the shadow of Musk: key takeaways from the Paris AI summit