Will a fifth year become the norm for women’s college basketball stars?

A picture


With lucrative NIL deals and championships to chase, the biggest names in the NCAA have something to think about being turning professionalOn UConn’s senior night in February 2024, inside a packed Gampel Pavilion, Paige Bueckers took the mic.“I know everybody wants me to address the elephant in the room,” she told the crowd.“Unfortunately, this will not be my last senior night here at UConn.” With that, she confirmed her decision to return for a fifth and final year with the Huskies.Bueckers’ extended eligibility comes from NCAA rules that grant student-athletes five years to compete in four seasons, with an additional year for those who played in 2020-21 due to the Covid-19 waiver.

And a 2022 injury that led to a redshirt year gave Bueckers yet another season.While many speculate she stayed for lucrative NIL deals – estimated at around $1.5m this season – Bueckers insists her decision is rooted in loyalty to UConn, her teammates, and her coaches.“Family camaraderie, loving it here, loving my teammates, and loving my coaches,” she says.Extended collegiate careers have become common at UConn, with Aubrey Griffin using six years and Caroline Ducharme and Azzi Fudd taking a fifth.

Still, one member of the UConn coaching staff told the Guardian that injuries rather than NIL or WNBA readiness have been behind these decisions.Bueckers addressed the issue during an appearance on Sue Bird’s Togethxr virtual panel, pushing back against the assumption that NIL money is the driving force behind her fifth year.“You just look at the comments, and it’s like, ‘Yeah, she’s just staying in college because she’s gonna make so much more [money] in college than in the WNBA [where the rookie maximum salary is $78,000],’” she said.“And it’s like, you guys have no idea.You’re making NIL in college, and once you get to the WNBA, those endorsements are going to follow you on top of the salary you’re already making.

It’s not that hard to educate yourself.”Still, Bueckers’ decision led to a debate.Some on social media criticized the age gap between the 23-year-old UConn star and many of her competitors, with one X user saying, “Paige Bueckers is an adult about to be playing basketball with 18-year-olds.” While staying an extra year is becoming more normalized, the conversation around extended eligibility, and the narratives attached to it, show no signs of fading.Hailey Van Lith, a fifth-year senior at TCU, has faced similar scrutiny.

She pushed back on the criticism in a recent news conference,“It’s just the new norm, it’s just what’s going to happen now,It’s funny to see people react and think about it negatively, but when you really analyze it, a lot of it comes down to frustration that they didn’t have that opportunity … I’m not gonna allow people to make me feel bad because I was blessed with this opportunity to play five years,”And she’s not wrong, this opportunity may be a “blessing” for players,The combination of NIL opportunities, academic advancement, and the ability to improve draft stock has created an undeniable shift in women’s college basketball.

As Kentucky guard Georgia Amoore says, “I think everyone had their own reasons [for staying in college for five years] and I’ve seen a variety of them, but mine was primarily for more development [before playing in the WNBA].”Despite the noise, Van Lith remains firm.“I think people are only saying that about me because I’m one of the ones they’re paying a lot of attention to.There’s a lot of girls taking their fifth years, and there’s a lot of girls having a lot of success [like] I’m having that are taking their fifth years.”And the numbers back her up.

As of March 2025, just seven days after the transfer portal opened, more than 1,100 Division I female college basketball players have entered it, with a significant number being seniors.Among them is a surprising fifth-year transfer from Notre Dame’s star player Olivia Miles, who had been the projected No 2 pick in the draft.This heightened focus on women’s college basketball, marked by repeated years and mass transfers, is not incidental.It represents a departure from the traditional structure of college ball.By comparison, in men’s basketball, where players can declare for the NBA after just one year, programs are increasingly urging male athletes to stay longer.

But there are far more reasons for male athletes to hurry into the NBA than there are for female athletes to join the WNBA.For a start there are more opportunities.In the NBA, 60 draft picks are distributed across 30 teams.The WNBA has just 39 picks spread among 13 teams.And while the rookie minimum in the NBA is a little over $1m, in the WNBA it’s less than $80,000.

It’s true that the WNBA’s popularity and revenue is growing thanks to the influx of stars such as Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese but NBA commissioner Adam Silver has acknowledged the WNBA’s financial struggles, saying in a 2024 statement, “This season, the [league] will lose $40m.”With the WNBA’s low salaries as well as its limited practice facilities and player amenities, there’s a significant incentive for athletes to extend their college careers, holding out to see if the league expands further before they go pro.And with only 39 draft spots available each season and a surplus of NCAA women’s basketball seniors competing for them, staying an extra year to improve one’s draft stock isn’t just a trend.It’s a strategic decision.Also, the WNBA is set to negotiate a new Collective Bargaining Agreement due to the league’s rising value.

According to WNBPA president Nneka Ogwumike, this agreement will bring significant change, including franchise expansion – with the addition of two new teams – an increased salary cap, improved working conditions, additional player benefits, and, most importantly, a share in WNBA equity for players,For seniors considering a fifth year, this presents an incentive,By staying an extra season, they can not only secure larger and more lucrative NIL deals in the short term but also enter the 2026 draft under a more favorable financial arrangement, ultimately earning a higher salary than if they declared this year,For some players, the decision isn’t as calculated, it could be just about wanting to win an NCAA championship,Amoore echoed this sentiment.

“I’ve trusted Coach Brooks for four years, and he’s put me in positions to succeed,” she said last month.“So, with his move [from Virginia Tech to Kentucky] and the challenge of competing in that talented conference with a brand-new team, it was a massive jump I was willing to take.”Sign up to Soccer with Jonathan WilsonJonathan Wilson brings expert analysis on the biggest stories from European soccerafter newsletter promotionFor Amoore, the decision to stay in college wasn’t just about competition but personal growth.“I knew it would challenge me in every way,” she says.“And I was going to get better – period, on court and off.

”Meanwhile, Iowa senior Kylie Feuerbach chose to return simply for “the opportunity to play with my closest friends and our incredible fanbase.”For some, the decision wasn’t driven by devotion or even much thought at all.Fudd, known for her indecisiveness, made that clear well before the declaration window, “I’ll see about a fifth year,” she said.UConn head coach Geno Auriemma even gave her an ultimatum, demanding an answer within 48 hours of the Big East Tournament.“I think she will [come back].

I think Azzi will [return],” Auriemma said.“But again, I’m not the number one voice in her ear anymore, like I used to be.Now, there’s a lot of voices.”One of those voices was returning senior Ducharme.“Every once in a while, I’d be like, ‘So, any closer to deciding?’” Ducharme told the Hartford Courant.

“One day, I just asked her when we were in the tubs, and she was like, ‘Don’t tell anyone, but I did make the decision.’”Just two weeks later, Fudd took to Instagram to post a photo of her smiling gleefully at the UConn scoreboard: 101 points to Arkansas State’s 31 points, a game in which she had scored 27 points.She captioned the photo, “Hey Gampel, thanks for last night… See you next year🤗😝😏 #onemoreyear.”Fudd, like many others, would be returning for a fifth year.
cultureSee all
A picture

‘No agenda’ in Guardian investigation of Noel Clarke, high court hears

There was “no agenda” in the Guardian’s investigation of sexual misconduct allegations against Noel Clarke, the high court has heard.In her second day in the witness box, Lucy Osborne, an investigative correspondent at the Guardian, defended the publication’s reporting in the face of questioning from the former Doctor Who star’s barrister, Philip Williams.Osborne, co-author of the investigation that led to the actor’s libel claim, denied Williams’s assertions that there were “major inconsistencies” in the accounts of alleged victims or that there was a conspiracy to bring down Clarke.She said that if there had been any concerns, she would have flagged them to the Guardian’s head of investigations, Paul Lewis.“There was no agenda,” Osborne told the court on Wednesday

A picture

Prudence Skene obituary

In a career that lasted half a century, Prue (Prudence) Skene, who has died aged 81, experienced much change in the role of the arts administrator – from keeping companies going in a rather makeshift manner to a formal career in which fundraising skills and the understanding of governance were crucial. She was an architect of a great deal of this change, becoming one of the best connected figures in the arts network in Britain and one who constantly aimed to improve the lot of arts leaders and practitioners.Her time as chair of the Arts Council of England (ACE) dance panel between 1992 and 1995 proved challenging: the dance scene was changing, with the rise of many smaller companies resulting in the need to axe larger organisations.In 1994 she became the first chair of the ACE lottery panel. This gave her responsibility for the distribution of a considerable amount of ACE funds in the 1990s, making her a key player in the development and rebuilding of theatres including the Royal Opera House and the Royal Court in London, and the Lowry in Manchester

A picture

Stephen Colbert on Trump administration’s deportations: ‘It’s goodbye, habeas corpus’

Late-night hosts talk Donald Trump’s alleged “liberation day” of tariffs and the administration’s deportation of people without due process.“I don’t know about you, but I am feeling good about America!” joked Stephen Colbert on Tuesday, AKA April Fools Day. “Speaking of fools, Donald Trump” and his “price-raising, economy-breaking tariffs” on what the president is calling “liberation day”.“Yes, ‘liberation day,’” the Late Show host said. “I’m reminded of the immortal words of Patrick Henry: ‘Give me liberty or charge me an extra $10,000 for a Hyundai Elantra

A picture

Yoko by David Sheff review – a queasily one-sided defence

In 1966 a woman sat down at the Destruction in Art Symposium at London’s Africa Centre and invited people to cut off her clothes. It was an era when Yves Klein used naked women as paintbrushes and Allen Jones made sculptures of fetishistically dressed women posed as furniture. But Yoko Ono was in control of her own self-sacrifice. It was the third time she’d performed this paradoxically passive action, and each time it was the audience who exposed themselves as they took scissors to her clothing.This was also the beginning of a sojourn in London for the Japanese-born New York artist that would catapult her from avant garde obscurity to global fame

A picture

Post your questions for Ani DiFranco

Ani DiFranco may be the only musician ever to have tired Prince into submission. When they jammed in 1999, he and his band called it quits after four hours while the Buffalo songwriter kept dancing. “After being with her, it dawned on me why she’s like that,” Prince said. “She’s never had a ceiling over her.”DiFranco has been tirelessly doing things to her own beat since 1989

A picture

Guardian journalist received large number of leads after Noel Clarke article, court told

A Guardian journalist who has worked on high-profile investigations into allegations of sexual misconduct by men said the volume of fresh leads received after writing about Noel Clarke was the most she had ever witnessed.Lucy Osborne, who, with Sirin Kale, carried out the Guardian’s investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against the Doctor Who actor, told the high court that she was “taken aback” by how many people got in touch after publication of the first article.Clarke, 49, is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over seven articles and a podcast published between April 2021 and March 2022 in which more than 20 women accused him of sexual misconduct.Osborne, who has also worked on investigations about David Copperfield and the former Elite model agency boss Gérald Marie, said in her witness statement: “I remember being taken aback by the number of possible leads we received following the first article.“By way of example, at least 25 new sources came forward between publication of the first article and the fourth article – a 24-hour period