Ollie Lawrence should be applauded for streetwise play – rugby must ditch holier-than-thou image | Gerard Meagher
A round of applause for Ollie Lawrence,Not for his apology after Bath’s last-gasp defeat by Northampton, which was entirely unnecessary, but for having the wherewithal to put his side into a winning position by demonstrating a streetwise streak all too seldom shown in elite rugby union,To recap, Lawrence was pilloried by Northampton supporters for going down in instalments after a fairly innocuous clash of heads with Alex Mitchell in the last few minutes of Saints’ thrilling 35-34 win over Bath on Sunday,He took himself down to his knees, clutched his face and in doing so, made sure that the match was stopped, the incident reviewed,Upon review, the referee Anthony Woodthorpe – who enjoyed an excellent match in the middle – determined that Mitchell was too high in his attempted tackle and the England scrum-half was shown a yellow card.
Bath were awarded a penalty, Finn Russell kicked it and it would have given the league leaders victory had Fin Smith not responded in kind from the tee in the dying throes.Lawrence was evidently fired up throughout the match – it was his late tackle on George Hendy that forced the Northampton full-back off the pitch just before half-time – and after he was caught smiling on camera, having just won the aforementioned penalty, he further provoked the ire of Saints supporters.On Sunday night he took to social media and wrote: “Apologies if my actions today offended anyone.On review, I understand the frustration voiced! I’ll be better.”No need.
Put simply, Lawrence realised that he had been the victim of foul play and ensured it was brought to the officials’ attention.In doing so, he allowed his side to retake the lead.As Northampton’s director of rugby, Phil Dowson, conceded afterwards: “The one who matters had a whistle and Anthony Woodthorpe said it was head-on-head.We’ve seen a few angles of it.We are looking to remove that concussion danger out of the game.
It looked pretty innocuous but the referee gave that decision and therefore it stands.”Ultimately it must be considered smart, clear-eyed thinking by Lawrence, in the closing stages of a match, with the pressure at its highest.An act that should be lauded.Given England’s propensity for confusion in the final quarters of matches of late, you would like to think Steve Borthwick will have been impressed by the centre’s actions.The naysayers will point to rugby values – a nebulous notion that can at times hold the sport back.
Rugby, as we are so often told, is at its heart a simple game of collisions.Win the gain line and more often than not you’ll win the match.However, it is also a game with a weighty, complex and ever-changing law book.At the elite end it is often a game based on the manipulation and exploitation of those laws.This weekend the Champions and Challenge Cups adopt four new law trials and you can put the mortgage on armies of analysts poring over the fine print to find loopholes and ways in which they can be exploited.
Moreover, rugby is a game in which cheating is celebrated,It is often repackaged as “the dark arts” and it has become a tired trope that Richie McCaw made a career out of it but it is hypocritical to laud a front row for illegally gaining the upper hand at scrum one minute, then chastise Lawrence for his actions the next,It is also unrealistic, in an age in which contact with the head is so rigorously policed, in which it is the players who bear the brunt in the form of yellow and red cards for such marginal transgressions, to expect that they will not manipulate or exploit those laws,They are both human beings and elite professional sportspeople and the only surprise is that it does not happen more often,For lawmakers to think it will not happen on the flawed basis that rugby players are better than that is naive in the extreme.
Indeed, the idea that penalties should not be milked on the basis of amateur ideals is anachronistic.Sign up to The BreakdownThe latest rugby union news and analysis, plus all the week's action reviewedafter newsletter promotionThere will be those who froth at the very thought.Who will say that anyone employing the same approach as Lawrence when turning out for their grassroots club on a Saturday afternoon will no longer be welcome.Fine.Much in the same way that any amateur footballer going down too easily in the penalty area on a Sunday morning can expect some rough justice the next time they receive the ball, a Lawrence copycat may be advised to avoid finding themselves at the bottom of a ruck for a while.
But rugby at amateur level is a different sport entirely to the professional game, played under different laws.The two are not comparable.The counterargument also warns of a sport played by gentlemen blah blah blah going the way of football.It is holier-than-thou rubbish that afflicts rugby.Football is a multibillion pound industry whereas three Premiership clubs have gone to the wall in recent years.
Football stopped clinging to its Corinthian spirit long ago and is in a far stronger place for it,At the elite end, rugby would do well to ditch the self-righteousness, to leave amateur ideals in the past and embrace professionalism, warts and all,What of the smirk that came across Lawrence’s face that seems to have riled so many? Again, we are often told that rugby needs more characters, that players need to show more personality to help grow the sport,Well, Lawrence, regardless of his apology, can expect a fierce welcome the next time he runs out at Franklin’s Gardens,He will play the role of villain whether he likes it or not and it will only add to the sense of theatre.
What’s not to like about that?
OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman accused of sexual abuse by sister in lawsuit
The sister of the OpenAI chief executive, Sam Altman, has filed a lawsuit alleging that he regularly sexually abused her for several years, starting when they were children.The lawsuit filed on 6 January in a US district court in the Eastern District of Missouri alleges that the abuse began when Ann Altman was three and Sam Altman was 12. The filing alleges that the last instance of abuse took place when he was an adult but his sister, known as Annie, was still a child.The chief executive of the ChatGPT developer posted a joint statement on X, which he had signed along with his mother, Connie, and his younger brothers, Max and Jack, denying the allegations and calling them “utterly untrue”.“Our family loves Annie and is very concerned about her wellbeing,” the statement said
Elon Musk’s Tesla has received almost £200m in UK grants since 2016
Elon Musk’s electric vehicle company has received almost £200m in grants from the UK government since 2016, according to analysis.Tesla, which is run by the tech billionaire who has become increasingly vocal about the UK government, has received £191m from Westminster through grants, according to Tussell, which analyses public contract data.The bulk of the funds came from the Department for Transport (DfT), which has given the company £188m over that period.The transport funds related to the plug-in car grant, which was designed to encourage the uptake of EVs and plug-in hybrids. Introduced in 2011, the grant provided a discount towards the cost of new plug-in cars, initially at £5,000, until the scheme ended in June 2022
Meta scrapped factcheckers ‘because systems were too complex’
The co-chair of Meta’s oversight board said the company’s systems had become “too complex”, as the chief executive of Elon Musk’s X welcomed its decision to scrap factcheckers.Helle Thorning-Schmidt, the co-chair of the social media company’s oversight board and the former prime minister of Denmark, has said she and the departed president of global affairs, Nick Clegg, had agreed “Meta systems have been too complex”, adding that there had been “over-enforcement”.On Tuesday, Mark Zuckerberg made the surprise announcement that the Facebook owner would move away from using third-party checkers to flag misleading content in favour of notes from other users.The 40-year-old billionaire said that, starting in the US, Meta would “get rid of factcheckers and replace them with community notes similar to X”, as the company moves to prioritise free speech in the run-up to Donald Trump’s return to the White House.The move came only days after Clegg, Britain’s former deputy prime minister, left Meta after six years at the company, most recently in the role of president of global affairs
Mark Zuckerberg sports $900,000 watch as he calls time on Meta fact-checking
Mark Zuckerberg wore a rare Swiss watch worth nearly $900,000 as he announced a sweeping policy overhaul across Facebook and Instagram and offered to help Donald Trump take on governments deemed too censorious, according to a report.In a video message posted to Facebook on Tuesday, Zuckerberg vowed to prioritise free speech after the return of Trump to the White House, and said that Meta Platforms – the world’s largest social media business – would ditch its third-party fact-checkers and recommend more political content across its social networks.Meta, which also owns WhatsApp and Threads, plans to “work with President Trump to push back on governments around the world that are going after American companies and pushing to censor more”, Zuckerberg added.Meta would also “get rid of a bunch of restrictions on topics like immigration and gender” that were “out of touch with mainstream discourse”, the 40-year-old billionaire said, while wearing a Greubel Forsey “Hand Made 1” on his left wrist, Bloomberg reported. The watch retails for $895,500 before taxes, according to the outlet
Why did Mark Zuckerberg end Facebook and Instagram’s factchecking program?
Meta is shifting to the right, following the prevailing political winds blowing through the United States. A more partisan era now looms for the social media giant and its corporate leaders, though Mark Zuckerberg himself has few personal politics other than ambition.On Tuesday morning, Meta disbanded Facebook and Instagram’s third-party factchecking program. The company will also recommend more political content across its social networks.CEO Zuckerberg announced the changes as he attempts to curry favor with Donald Trump’s incoming administration, demonstrating just how far he will go to win the president-elect’s approval
Ditching of Facebook factcheckers a ‘major step back’ for public discourse, critics say
Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to ditch factcheckers on Facebook and “prioritise free speech” weeks before Donald Trump returns to power was condemned on Tuesday as a “major step back” for public discourse.The Meta founder announced multiple changes to his platforms including Facebook and Instagram in an attempt to “dramatically reduce the amount of censorship”.In a statement on Tuesday he said that, starting in the US, independent factcheckers would be replaced in the US by a system of “community notes” similar to that used on X, Elon Musk’s social media platform, which relies on users to add caveats and context to contentious posts.Content moderation teams would also be moved from California to Texas “where there is less concern about the bias of our teams”, said Zuckerberg in a five-minute video statement that Nina Jankowicz, a former US government official tasked with fighting disinformation, described as “a full bending of the knee to Trump”.Changes to the way Meta filtered content would also mean “we’re going to catch less bad stuff” while still taking seriously “a lot of legitimately bad stuff out there, drugs, terrorism, child exploitation”, Zuckerberg said
Two power station owners to get more than £12m for three hours of electricity
Rachel Reeves says she has ‘iron grip’ on finances as borrowing costs surge
Meta’s changes to policing will lead to clash with EU and UK, say experts
Revisions of ‘hateful conduct’: what users can now say on Meta platforms
Travis Kelce denies Chiefs lost to eliminate Bengals from NFL playoffs
‘I’ve been hooked’: scourge of shady line calls baffles Raducanu and others