Brazil lifts ban on X after Elon Musk complies with court demands
Brazilians are set to regain access to X after a supreme court judge lifted a ban introduced nearly six weeks ago as a result of Elon Musk’s failure to comply with the South American country’s laws.X was blocked in Brazil, where it had more than 22 million users, at the end of August in what was the culmination of a months-long arm wrestle between the network’s billionaire owner and the Brazilian supreme court.The immediate trigger for the ban was Musk’s failure to name a local representative and pay millions of dollars worth of fines.But the backdrop was a long-running and politically charged battle between the outspoken tech billionaire and Brazil’s top court, which was trying to combat the dissemination of far-right misinformation and anti-democratic content on the social network.Experts and Brazilian authorities partly blamed the spread of such incendiary online content for the far-right riots that rocked Brasília in January 2023.
Musk – who has aligned himself with far-right figures including Brazil’s former president Jair Bolsonaro – reacted angrily to August’s ban.He called one supreme court judge, Alexandre de Moraes, a dictator and “Voldemort” and posted a meme of a dog dangling its private parts in the face of another animal as a sign of his revolt.But in recent days Musk appears to have backed down, paying 28.6m reais (£3.9m) in fines and naming a Brazilian lawyer as X’s local representative, as required by the country’s laws.
Given those steps, Moraes wrote that he ordered the “end of the suspension and authorise[d] the immediate return of X’s activities in Brazil” in a legal decision issued on Tuesday.Moraes ordered Brazil’s telecommunications regulator, Anatel, to implement his ruling – although on Tuesday evening X remained inaccessible without the use of a virtual private network.The network is expected to become available in the coming hours.Brazilian commentators and pro-democracy activists celebrated what they portrayed as X’s surrender to the rule-of-law as a victory for the country’s institutions and sovereignty.“[The ban] wasn’t censorship,” Gerson Camarotti, a prominent political commentator, told the news channel GloboNews.
“This was about non-compliance with judicial decisions … It’s Brazilian democracy that gains with this.”Camarotti noted how, over the past few weeks, life in Brazil had continued as normal, despite the lack of Musk’s increasingly unruly network.Several million Brazilian social media users simply relocated to the rival network Bluesky.“The most interesting thing is that Brazil didn’t grind to a halt because of [the ban on] X … Nobody in Brazil died because of the absence of X,” Camarotti added, lamenting how Musk’s social media platform had become “the network of hatred”.In a statement, the social media activism organisation Sleeping Giants also voiced support for what it called “a significant victory for Brazilian democracy, our political institutions, and the sovereignty of our state”.
“The suspension of X was an important measure to ensure that all companies, including big tech, comply with and respect Brazilian laws, particularly when the human rights of our citizens are at stake and our democratic institutions are being undermined,” Sleeping Giants said,“Contrary to some misconceptions, X was not suspended in Brazil to suppress freedom of speech,The Supreme Federal Court’s judicial decisions came after a series of orders that were ignored by the social media company,”
Don’t drag my autistic children into the Tories’ war on ‘woke’ | Letters
I felt compelled to respond to the latest Conservative punch-down: Kemi Badenoch’s endorsement of dangerously false claims on the administrative load of neurodivergence (What kind of person would drag autistic children into the culture wars? The Kemi Badenoch kind, 14 October). As a parent of two autistic boys without a formal diagnosis – the eldest already two years into the waiting list, with the youngster’s referral somewhere in the ether – I’m absolutely livid. To see your loved ones struggle without the support they need to keep them safe and well is hard enough, before they’re dragged into Tory point-scoring against “woke” society.On a professional level, I’m even more affronted by these accusations of workplace meddling and entitlement by people with neurodevelopmental differences. I’m part of a research group exploring autistic health inequalities, and I can assure readers that there is ample evidence that every factor that equates to poor health outcomes is more prevalent in the autistic community
Ethical alarms should be ringing over weight-loss jabs for the jobless | Letters
The proposal by the health secretary, Wes Streeting, that weight-loss drugs could be provided to unemployed people deemed to be obese, as a way to help them get back to work and ease the demands on the NHS caused by obesity, should raise ethical alarms (Employers should be fined for unhealthy workplaces, says thinktank, 16 October).Would taking the drug be voluntary, or would it become a condition for entitlement to benefits? Recalling Labour’s previous support for conditionality and sanctions, one can guess which way it would go.Would giving drugs for obesity be a precedent for drugs for other medical conditions deemed to affect the probability of obtaining jobs? Many who become unemployed become depressed. Will the Department for Work and Pensions insist on their taking antidepressants, or lose benefits? Many unemployed people become angry. Will they be given anger‑suppressing drugs?Another set of ethical issues relates to the implied selectivity
Mental health professionals must work together | Letters
Psychiatrists have a fundamental role to play in resolving the ongoing mental health crisis and it is disappointing to see that outdated and erroneous tropes about our work are still widely believed, even by other mental health professionals (Letters, 10 October).People who have a mental illness usually require a range of therapeutic approaches, including psychotherapy, social and occupational interventions, family work and medication. As doctors, psychiatrists take a holistic approach that recognises the complex interaction between psychological, social, cultural, environmental and biological factors, and the impact that these can have on mental health. This ensures that patients receive personalised care and treatment options as well as support from a variety of other services.Psychiatry has been at the forefront of developing the biopsychosocial model, which is routinely used in modern psychiatric practice to help people recover from all types of mental illness
UK housing: how has unsafe cladding affected you and your home?
We would like to find out more about people who live in homes with unsafe cladding and what their experience has been like over the years. Have remedial works been completed, are in progress, or are yet to start? Have you experienced any problems moving home, selling or remortgaging? What effect, if any, has it had on your mental and physical health?You can tell us how living in a residential building with unsafe cladding has affected you, by filling in the form below.Please be specific and include as much detail as possible. Please be specific and include as much detail as possible. Please be specific and include as much detail as possible
Tell us: do you know someone who died in pregnancy or during childbirth?
We’d like to find out more about maternal deaths in the UK as recent figures show a rise in numbers. We’re interested in hearing from anyone whose friend, relative or loved one died in pregnancy, during childbirth, or within a year of pregnancy between 2020 and 2024.What was their experience like and what kind of treatment or care did they receive? We’re also interested in hearing from healthcare professionals and their experiences.You can share your experience by filling in the form below. Please leave blank if you wish to be anonymousPlease be specific and include as much detail as possible
Archbishop of Canterbury to meet MP behind assisted dying bill
The archbishop of Canterbury is to meet the architect of a parliamentary bill to legalise assisted dying after he described a change in the law as dangerous.Kim Leadbeater, MP for Spen Valley, wrote to Justin Welby after he intervened in the debate over assisted dying. The archbishop said the MP’s private member’s bill would lead to a “slippery slope”, including a broadening of criteria and pressure on people to die prematurely.She proposed a meeting to discuss the issues. Lambeth Palace said it was trying to find a mutually convenient date
Companies House to stop fraudsters joining up under fake names like ‘Darth Vader’
New ‘buy now, pay later’ rules to protect UK shoppers from 2026
Watchdog opens investigation into anti-immigrant posts on Facebook
Meta fires staff for ‘using free meal vouchers to buy household goods’
Chess: England gains new grandmaster as Ameet Ghasi qualifies at age 37
Australia’s domination ends at Women’s T20 World Cup but shock defeat can spark a new era | Megan Maurice