Microsoft faces growing unrest over role in Israel’s war on Gaza: ‘Close to a tipping point’

A picture


Turmoil spreads at company over Israel’s extensive use of its AI and cloud computing services in Gaza warFor the second time in the last month, Microsoft employees disrupted high-level executives speaking at an event celebrating the company’s 50th anniversary on 4 April, in protest against the company’s role in Israel’s ongoing siege on Gaza,The AI executive Mustafa Suleyman was interrupted by the employees Ibtihal Aboussad and Vaniya Agrawal,The two were fired within days,The Microsoft president, Brad Smith, and the former CEO Steve Ballmer were shouted down at Seattle’s Great Hall on 20 March by a current and former employee,The March event was preceded by a rally outside that also included current and former employees of the tech giant.

Protesters projected a sign on to the hall’s wall saying: “Microsoft powers genocide” – a reference to Israel’s extensive use of the company’s AI and cloud computing services since 7 October 2023, as “the IDF’s insatiable demand for bombs was matched by its need for greater access to cloud computing services,” the Guardian reported.The rally and disruption were the latest of a growing number of protests in which employees at Microsoft’s headquarters in Redmond, Washington state, have urged the company to cut ties with Israel, after discontent around the issue among some of them simmered for a year-plus on company message boards, in emails and on calls with what the company calls “workplace conflict” team members.Taken together, the protests suggest that more will follow, as well as employees deciding to leave the company altogether, according to present and past employees who spoke to the Guardian.Microsoft did not reply to a request for comment.The series of events echoes those at other tech companies, including Google, where employees have likewise protested against the company’s ties to Israel and been fired.

In February, Google changed its AI guidelines, removing commitments not to use artificial intelligence for surveillance or weapons.The former Microsoft software engineer Hossam Nasr described the situation at the company as “very close to a tipping point”.He highlighted the recent events, a 24 February demonstration at the company’s first in-person town hall since early in the pandemic and a 24 October lunchtime vigil for the tens of thousands of Palestinians that Israel has killed in the last 18 months, as examples of rising discontent.The February demonstration was short-lived: as the Microsoft CEO, Satya Nadella, began talking up new products, five employees stood on a platform above, exposing lettering on their T-shirts that spelled out the words: “Does Our Code Kill Kids, Satya?” Within minutes, several men quietly ushered them out of the room.As for the October rally, Nasr and researcher and the data scientist Abdo Mohamed helped organize the event; both were fired shortly afterward.

The dismissals, together with a spate of recent, in-depth articles about Microsoft’s role in Israel’s siege on Gaza, have helped galvanize those in the company who are concerned about the issue, according to Nasr, the former employee Aboussad, and two current employees who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation.Aboussad told the Guardian she had grown increasingly conflicted in recent months as a software engineer working in AI.After several years at the company, she said, recent reporting “showed [me] more and more Microsoft’s deep ties to the Israeli government”.An AP report on the use of US-made AI in Gaza, including Microsoft’s, was the “last straw because it showed that AI is being used to target and murder Palestinians … I began thinking, there’s no way I can stay at Microsoft and have clean hands,” Aboussad said.The software engineer said it was impossible to know if her work was deployed in Gaza, since the company “anonymizes” all contracts with the Israeli government.

At the same time, she said: “I’m not confident my paycheck doesn’t originate from money that comes from the Israeli government.”Within days of speaking to the Guardian, Aboussad was fired.A half-dozen or so colleagues have told her they were thinking of leaving the company, she said.Before the recent, in-person protests, Microsoft employees had been mostly weighing in online about Hamas’s attack and Israel’s ongoing retaliation.Some discourse on Microsoft’s Viva Engage company message board grew contentious.

One employee posted: “There is no symmetry between people who educate their children on [sic] schools to murder Jewish people and people that are just defending themselves.” Several pleas for compassion for Palestinians were met with the blunt epithet “terrorist supporters”.Employees concerned about the fate of Palestinians or critical of Israel have also been complaining about what they viewed as a double standard since shortly after 7 October.They allege Microsoft censors their viewpoints in internal forums but does not treat supporters of Israel the same.One employee who spoke with the Guardian shared screenshots of emails from members of the company’s “Global Employee Relations Team”, whose job is to handle “complex and sensitive matters, conduct investigations and manage workplace conflict”, according to Microsoft.

One email details an employee complaint over the use of terms such as “ethnic cleansing” on Viva Engage, to describe Israel’s actions in Gaza.Another message underlines the need to follow “company values” like “respect and kindness to each other” when posting about Israel and Gaza or the West Bank.On 16 November 2023, Microsoft blocked employees from posting in the message board’s “All Company” channel altogether, which broadcasts to all of Microsoft’s 400,000 employees and vendors.The tenor of online, internal activism changed over the course of 2024, said Nasr.In the months following 7 October, many employees with concerns about events in Gaza focused on Microsoft’s public statements and circulated a petition urging the company to publicly call for a ceasefire.

But their attention gradually turned to the company’s own business practices, he said.By mid-year, Nasr and others were organizing “No Azure for Apartheid” a reference to Microsoft’s Azure suite of cloud computing and AI products.The group gathers signatures from fellow employees on a petition urging the company to cancel its cloud computing and AI contracts with the Israeli military and to disclose its ties to the country’s government.Sign up to TechScapeA weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our livesafter newsletter promotionIn the new year, documents obtained by Dropsite, an independent news outlet, revealed “a ‘gold rush’ among tech companies seeking to provide services to the Israeli military”– including Microsoft.Dropsite shared the documents with the Guardian, leading to another story, and with +972 magazine, an Israeli outlet.

A month later, on 18 February, the AP published its own reporting,This run of detailed, in-depth reporting fueled the simmering concerns among some Microsoft employees,The day after the AP’s investigation published, according to screenshots of Viva Engage messages, an employee asked senior leadership about the articles, wondering whether “Microsoft has completely abandoned its … Human Rights Statements?”The post notes that Microsoft’s human rights commitments include “champion[ing] the positive role of technology across the globe” and “reduce[ing] the risk of harm”,“However, this AP investigation clearly shows the AI technology we provide directly enables Gaza’s destruction,” the post reads,By the next morning, the post was removed from the chat.

The handful of articles has been “absolutely critical” to offline organizing efforts, said Anna Hattle, who has been with the company nearly five years.This is particularly true since “a lot of tech workers exist in a bubble, and Microsoft wants to keep it that way.An employee who doesn’t know their work is being used for AI weapons isn’t going to do anything about it.” At work and at rallies, she said, “individual conversations with [fellow employees]” helps spread information contained in the coverage.Nasr said that No Azure for Apartheid also worked with Boycott, Divest, Sanctions (BDS) to add Microsoft to its list of boycott campaigns.

BDS announced the campaign 3 April, highlighting how the “Israeli army relies heavily on Microsoft to meet technological requirements,”At the same time, one Microsoft employee told the Guardian she was “exhausted” by the struggle to draw attention to what she sees as a betrayal of the company’s stated values in its contracts with Israel,As an example, she cited an event in which the Palestinian journalist Ahmed Shihab-Eldin was invited in November 2023, to speak to employees,Israeli employees filed reports alleging that the organizers were antisemitic, and the company cancelled the event,She also pointed to the back and forth on Viva Engage, including one screenshot that showed an employee calling Palestinians “Killers.

Terrorists,Monsters,”Other employees have already left,On 4 December, Angela Yu sent an email to nearly 30,000 employees announcing her resignation,“I joined Microsoft with the belief that my work will advance technology ‘for the good of humanity’,” she wrote.

Yu highlighted the recent reporting on Microsoft’s ties to Israel and said: “It hurts my conscience to know that the products you and I work on are enabling the Israeli military to accelerate its project of ethnic cleansing.”Yu went on to urge anyone reading to sign “No Azure for Apartheid’s” petition.She noted that the company had dropped business contracts for ethical reasons before – including in 1986, when it cut ties with South Africa over apartheid.At the time, Microsoft’s global sales were about $100m, according to contemporaneous news coverage – or less than the current value of one contract between the tech company and Israel’s ministry of defense.The “exhausted” employee said these numbers point to the difficulty of protesting against Microsoft’s presence in Israel.

The company is “a money machine”, she said.“All they care about is money.AI and work, work, work.”
businessSee all
A picture

Do those so-called US recession indicators actually mean anything? | Gene Marks

As someone who keeps a close eye on the economy, I often bump into those strange metrics that people like to write about that, supposedly, unlock the secret of whether or not a recession is looming.Given what’s going on, it’s no surprise that they are back again. Just last week Bloomberg reported a cut in spending at hair stylists. There’s the “lipstick index” – in tough economic times, women load up on lipstick instead of spending their dwindling funds on bigger-ticket items. Former Fed chair Alan Greenspan liked to follow men’s underwear sales because hey, when times are tough, we guys are not willing to buy new shorts

A picture

Jim Ratcliffe’s chemicals business under pressure from Trump tariffs, Moody’s warns

Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s loss-making chemicals business could take longer than expected to recover its financial health because of Donald Trump’s trade tariffs, analysts have said.The billionaire industrialist has faced growing concerns over the state of his chemicals group amid problems with his business interests in Manchester United and All Blacks rugby.In a fresh cause for concern, one of the key companies within Ratcliffe’s sprawling business empire, Ineos Quattro, has reported that its financial losses more than doubled to €819m (£702m) at the end of last year, from €291m in 2023, its first loss in at least five years.The chemical company, which supplies a range of industries including carmakers and pharmaceutical companies, said in its annual report that its “substantial indebtedness” crept almost half a billion euros higher during 2024 to reach nearly €7.7bn

A picture

Labour must focus on risk to global financial stability posed by Trump policies, not only trade | Heather Stewart

Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have underlined how much the world has changed after Donald Trump’s “liberation day”, with the UK prime minister even declaring an end to globalisation.But as the chancellor prepares to fly to Washington this week to meet her global counterparts at the International Monetary Fund meetings, Labour appears to see the risks purely in terms of the hit to international trade.While frantically negotiating with Washington over tariffs, the government is pressing ahead with plans to deregulate the City – just as global financial stability appears threatened by the chaos unleashed by the White House.Labour has taken a muscular approach to saving the steelworks in Scunthorpe, and Reeves has written of the need for a “strong, smart and agile state to support key industries”.Yet Labour’s stance on the UK’s highly globalised financial sector appears to remain the one set out in the chancellor’s Mansion House speech in November: that rules imposed after the 2008 crash have “gone too far”

A picture

Another crisis, another IMF summit: but unlike 2008, the delegates are disunited

When the world’s finance ministers and central bank governors gather at the International Monetary Fund in Washington this week, it may kindle memories of another meeting, also held against the backdrop of a global economic crisis, in autumn 2008.Then, as the aftershocks from the collapse of Lehman Brothers ripped through financial markets, central banks coordinated drastic emergency rate cuts, and the UK chancellor, Alistair Darling, urged his G7 counterparts to emulate the UK’s approach and shore up stricken banks.Policy mistakes, including lax financial regulation, were partly to blame back in 2008 – but as this week’s IMF and World Bank spring meetings convene, the chaos confronting key decision-makers in the global economy has been entirely manufactured in the White House.Donald Trump’s arbitrary “reciprocal” tariffs have been paused for 90 days, with many governments hoping they will never be reinstated. But the 10% across-the-board levy that remains in place – alongside eye-watering increases in tariffs on the US’s great geopolitical rival, China – still represents a historic shock to the global trading system

A picture

‘It might be gutted’ – Boots braces for dose of private equity’s bitter medicine

The 176-year-old chemist is preparing for another change of hands. What’s the mood of staff and residents at its home base in Nottinghamshire?‘We’ve had several rounds of cost-cutting and it could happen again,” says a Boots worker. Fears are running high as the Nottinghamshire-based chemist prepares to change hands – perhaps twice in quick succession.The US private equity firm Sycamore Partners is close to finalising a $10bn (£7.8bn) deal to take over the listed US owner of Boots, Walgreens Boots Alliance

A picture

It’s not poverty that’s breeding the new populism. It’s wealth | Phillip Inman

Steve Coogan wants ­people to see his new film, The Penguin Lessons, and think about how they might be living in a wealthy cocoon, disengaged from the world.The film’s central character – a Briton teaching expat children in Argentina – rescues a penguin and tries to help local people persecuted by the rightwing government. Re-enacting a true story, Coogan is showing how it’s possible to be involved in local communities even when the protagonist is an outsider.Coogan is concerned about a political shift to the right built on a more selfish outlook, one that focuses on close family and casts a cold eye on people less fortunate. We see it in the US, in the rise of Reform in the UK, and in France and Germany