What are ‘nudification’ apps and how would a ban in the UK work?
The children’s commissioner for England is calling for “nudification” apps to be banned to prevent them generating sexual imagery of children.But what are they and would a ban work?Advances in artificial intelligence software have paved the way for the emergence of “nudification” tools, which are becoming easier to find on social media or search engines.These are apps and websites that produce deepfake nude images of real people using generative AI.This can involve removing clothes, getting an image to move suggestively, or pasting a head on to a naked body.The results often look highly realistic.
AI tools create images by learning from, and replicating elements of, existing images.Nudification apps are thought to be trained on vast datasets of mostly female images because they tend to work most effectively on women’s bodies.As a result, 99% of sexually explicit deepfakes accessible online are estimated to be of women and girls.Although it is illegal to possess AI-generated sexual content featuring children, the AI models that create these images are not illegal.The children’s commissioner is asking the government to legislate to ban AI tools that are designed or marketed as “nudification” services.
This could be achieved through a number of legal mechanisms.For example, one option would be through an amendment to the product safety and metrology bill that would ensure that providers of generative AI tools are required to carry out risk assessments for illegal and harmful activity, and to take reasonable steps to design that risk out of the product.This would mean that tools developed using generative AI models have to be risk-assessed for illegal and harmful activity before they are available in the UK.Nudification apps in their current form are not safe against illegal activity and will not be certified to be available in the UK.The second option is for the government to introduce an AI bill in this parliamentary session which would make it the responsibility of providers of generative AI models to prevent their use for nudifying children.
Technology companies could be legally required to test their products against whether they can be used to nudify children before launching them in the UK market, and held to account if their models are used for this purpose,However, critics of a ban may challenge it on internet freedom grounds, said Danielle Reece-Greenhalgh, a partner at the London law firm Corker Binning,She said it could be difficult to enforce as AI models improve, making it even harder to distinguish between “real” and “AI” created material,The children’s commissioner does not believe that the Online Safety Act contains the provisions required to fully protect children from harm,However, she notes that in the meantime, the risk can be partially mitigated through Ofcom’s implementation of the act.
As providers of sexually explicit or pornographic material, nudification services fall under its scope.They are required to verify that users are aged over 18 before allowing them access to content.However, this would not stop adults from making images of children.Ofcom could also strengthen its provisions to protect children from harm by ensuring it is proactive in identifying emerging harms.Social media companies are required to carry out risk assessments to comply with the Online Safety Act.
This should require them to identify and mitigate the risk to children of content produced by sexually explicit deepfake tools, including content used to promote them.The report also asks the government to provide more support for children to report an intimate image – including false ones that have been created using AI – that has been shared in a public online space, and to get it removed.It could ask Ofcom to require technology companies to embed “report remove” tools.The report also suggests that sexually explicit deepfake technology be included on PSHE (personal, social, health and economic) curriculums.
Jeanette Winterson: ‘I’d like to go up in space as a very old lady and just be pushed out’
Your debut novel Oranges are Not the Only Fruit turns 40 years old this year. How do you feel about it at this point in your life?Can you believe it? I find that astonishing. I’m always having to think about it because people keep bothering me about it! Its next iteration is a musical, and then I really hope that’s the end. Just let me go! Obviously I love Oranges and I revisited it again with [her 2011 memoir] Why Be Happy When You Could be Normal? and the musical too. Surely, by the rule of three, this is it? Then I can live in peace and plant potatoes
David Tennant wishes JK Rowling no ‘ill will’ but says trans people ‘demonised’
David Tennant has criticised the “demonisation” of the trans community, saying that while he wishes JK Rowling “no ill will”, he hopes that “we can all as a society just let people be”.The Scottish actor, who appeared in the 2005 film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, likened the treatment of transgender people to the Thatcher government’s introduction of section 28 – a 1988 law that prohibited local authorities from “promoting” homosexuality.“When I was a teenager, there was this thing that Mrs Thatcher’s government introduced called section 28, which was about stopping the promotion of homosexuality in school, which was a weird umbrella term, which was basically saying it was illegal to talk about being gay in school, or to suggest that that might be a normal way of behaving,” said Tennant during an appearance on ITV1 show The Assembly.“We look back on that now as a medieval, absurd thing to try and say, and I think the way the trans community is being demonised and othered is exactly the same. It’s become this kind of political football
Sex and the City made me leave my loveless marriage
I had always avoided watching Sex and the City. I thought it looked a bit girlie for me. It was only during lockdown that I finally got round to seeing it. I found the first few episodes entertaining, but didn’t really connect with any of the storylines. I was the same age as the characters, but I had been in a relationship for four years, so Carrie’s disastrous dates felt far removed from my own experience
From The Friend to Taskmaster: your complete entertainment guide for the week ahead
The FriendOut now Starring Naomi Watts and Bill Murray, this adaptation of the acclaimed novel sees a New York-based writer (Watts) processing the suicide of a close friend who has bequeathed her his 150lb great dane, which proceeds to create multiple issues in her life as well as creating a poignant link to the past.Wind, Tide & OarOut now Shot on real film over a three-year timespan, and taking in oceans, rivers and the coastline around France, the UK and the Netherlands, Huw Wahl’s documentary is a homage to the art of sailing – and other engineless techniques such as rowing. As the title puts it, it’s all about wind, tide and oar.AprilOut now Dea Kulumbegashvili’s Venice festival prize winner begins with a delivery-room tragedy at a hospital in Georgia, where Nina (Ia Sukhitashvili) works as an obstetrician. She also moonlights by helping women with illegal abortions, but with a negligence investigation hanging over her, her two worlds threaten to collide
The Guide #188: How 25 years of music has shaped the charts from monoculture to mass playlists
Somehow we’re a quarter of the way through the 21st century (or 1/40th through the new millennia, for those taking a really long view of things). How did that happen? It doesn’t seem long ago that I was sitting on a translucent orange inflatable sofa, clad in jeans so baggy that you could fit your entire face in one leghole, Discman in hand, wondering what the next century might bring. Time really does slip by quickly, doesn’t it?On the other hand, quite a lot has been stuffed into those 25 years, politically, technologically, environmentally and, of course, culturally. Now seems a good time to take stock. Once a month over the next three months we’ll be looking at how music, TV and film have evolved since 2000, as seen through the most popular songs, shows and movies – the pop in pop culture
Jimmy Kimmel on Hegseth bringing his wife to meetings: ‘Maybe she’s his designated driver’
With several hosts still on holiday, Jimmy Kimmel reacts to reports of a screaming match at the White House and Pete Hegseth bringing his wife to meetings.Thursday was Bring Your Child To Work Day, and indeed, “there’s been a lot of childish behavior at the White House as of late,” said Kimmel. For example, Axios reported that Elon Musk had an expletive-filled, chest-to-chest shouting match outside the Oval Office with treasury secretary Scott Bessent over who would run the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).Bessent reportedly confronted Musk in a hallway, and “the F-bombs started to fly – or at least, that’s what Pete Hegseth texted his wife and brother,” Kimmel quipped.The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, “put her own spin on it”, Kimmel noted
Fathers ‘betrayed’ by Labour workers’ rights bill, say paternity leave campaigners
Reform UK challenged to give details on donations after £2m mailshot campaign
‘Tories are not listening’: Ed Davey sure Lib Dems can woo more disgruntled voters
Nigel Farage is a political fraud ‘cosplaying’ as working-class champion, TUC chief says
For political parties judging this year’s local election results it’s all about the baseline
Starmer faces Labour revolt over plan to raid bank accounts of benefit claimants