Consumers don’t have a debt problem. The US government does | Gene Marks

A picture


A recent report from the Federal Reserve warned that consumer debt is now more than $18tn and the people are worried.Americans’ “credit card and household debt reach all-time high”, reports Fox News.Consumers are “finding it harder and harder to pay off their debt”, claims CNN.A “third of Americans have more credit card debt than emergency savings”, says Marketplace.Yes, consumer debt has ticked up this year.

It’s true that some consumer debt – particularly student loans – has soared in the past few years.But – although worrisome – this debt is still being used to fund education and skills.Other consumer debts are being used to buy homes and cars and fund the purchases that make life livable, not to mention the many industries that rely on this spending.I’m not worried about consumer debt.But as a business owner I am worried about our national debt.

After years of hearing and ignoring the warnings, I’m starting to see just how this debt is going to actually hit my business.And yours.Will it be because of a default? That’s unlikely.We are not Greece.Our debts – most of which are to real-life people, companies and governments – aren’t in a currency that we don’t control.

It’s in US dollars,That’s a good thing,But also a bad thing,Here’s why: our interest payments as a percentage of total federal spending are ballooning,When our government spent money in 2020, 7% went towards interest.

In just four years, that number has more than doubled to 16%.That’s because our levels of debt have increased during that time from $24tn to $36tn and interest rates charged to banks have increased from close to zero to over 4%.If 16 cents on every dollar is now being spent by the government on interest, where does that money come from? It has to be taken from somewhere.How does the government meet these obligations? There are only three ways.The government can cut expenses in order to afford these higher interest costs.

But c’mon, despite Elon Musk and the PR campaign of the so-called “department of government efficiency’”, how much will really be cut in the end? When has the federal government actually decreased its expenses? Never.Almost two-thirds of our government budget is non-discretionary payment for social security, Medicare, defense and other entitlements.And in the end, how much will really be saved after all the lawsuits, negotiations and accounting trickery?What about revenue increases? Please.As if the government is going to raise taxes at the exact time that the Trump administration is pushing trillions of dollars of permanent tax cuts.That is political suicide.

Which really leaves only one solution: printing more money.Greece couldn’t do that, because being on the euro, it wasn’t their money to print.But the Fed can print money all day to meet our obligations.And that’s exactly what they’ll do.Why should we care? It’s simple supply and demand.

More money in the system that’s just paying interest and not being used to produce any tangible product creates an oversupply.And what happens when there’s too much of something? It loses its value.And in this case, that loss of value will ultimately drive more inflation.And to combat this, the Fed will need to maintain higher interest rates, which keeps us in the same never-ending cycle.Some economists still believe that inflation will return to the Fed’s preferred 2% level.

Maybe, but only in the very short run.But if you’re running a small business you can expect that higher than historical inflation and interest rates – even higher than what we have today – will probably be the norm for the foreseeable future.I don’t see any other scenario.Consumers don’t have a debt problem.Our government does.

cultureSee all
A picture

‘I stripped away this caricature that I created’: Pamela Anderson on makeup, activism and gardening

The star of Baywatch and The Last Showgirl answers questions from Observer readers and famous fans including Stella McCartney, Liam Neeson, Ruby Wax and Naomi KleinPamela Anderson, makeup-free and beautiful in a floral Westwood suit, is making a fuss of my dog. My dog likes her. I’m not a particular believer in the idea that animals are great character judges but, in this case, me and the dog are aligned. I like Anderson too. She combines openness with a kind of vulnerability, and you warm to her immediately

A picture

On my radar: Shon Faye’s cultural highlights

The author on an obscene drill track, a writing retreat off the coast of Naples and her love of Almodóvar filmsBorn in Bristol in 1988, Shon Faye studied English literature at Oxford University and trained as a lawyer before turning to writing. She worked as editor-at-large at Dazed, and has contributed to publications including the Guardian, Vice, Novara and Vogue, where she writes the Dear Shon advice column. She hosts the Call Me Mother podcast, for which she interviews LGBTQ+ trailblazers. Faye’s bestselling first book, The Transgender Issue, was published in 2021; her second book, Love in Exile, about the politics of romantic love and relationships, is out now on Allen Lane. She lives in London

A picture

Nine working-class creatives on class in the arts – and how they made it

British artists have said the UK’s unique cultural output is under threat unless more is done to improve access to their industries, after analysis showed that almost a third of major arts leaders were privately educated. The Guardian spoke to visual artists, directors, classical musicians and playwrights about their views on class and the arts, and how they got managed to get established.“We have to get around the instinctive reaction to working-class accents a lot of people have, which is that this is somebody who’s either funny or dangerous. We as writers and producers and directors can help by not slipping into that – so that if we want a quick shorthand for ‘this person is dangerous’, we give them a broad working-class accent. Or ‘this person is going to say funny, stupid things’, we give them a working-class accent again

A picture

The Guide #179: How National Theatre Live brought the magic of the stage to the cinema

Last month I went to the National Theatre to catch The Importance of Being Earnest, Oscar Wilde’s campy, farcical comedy. But unlike other theatre visits, this time I was surrounded by a number of large cameras.This was not due to some crisis in audience etiquette, but because I was watching the live-capture of the onstage performance. As I was enjoying Ncuti Gatwa’s Algernon pretending to play piano in a dazzling hot-pink dress, production teams in a number of trucks outside were frantically working to ensure the performance would be optimised for cinema screens across the world.This is, of course, the great operation of National Theatre Live

A picture

Working-class creatives don’t stand a chance in UK today, leading artists warn

Artists, directors and actors have raised the alarm about what they describe as a rigged system preventing working-class talent thriving in their industries after analysis showed almost a third of major arts leaders were educated privately.The creator of Peaky Blinders, Steven Knight, the director Shane Meadows and the Turner prize winner Jesse Darling were among those who spoke to the Guardian about what was described as a crisis facing the sector.They spoke after a Guardian survey of the 50 organisations that receive the most Arts Council England funding revealed a disproportionate number of leadership roles were occupied by people who were educated privately and those who went to the universities of Oxford or Cambridge.Almost a third (30%) of artistic directors and other creative leaders were educated privately compared with a national average of 7%. More than a third (36%) of the organisations’ chief executives or other executive directors went to private schools

A picture

Who is ‘working class’ and why does it matter in the arts?

In recent years, a string of academic reports have shown in stark terms just how elitist the arts have become over the last four decades. The proportion of working-class actors, musicians and writers has shrunk by half since the 1970s, according to one piece of research, while another study found fewer than one in 10 arts workers in the UK had working-class roots.Sutton Trust research released last year found the creative industries were dominated by people from the most affluent backgrounds, which it defined as those from “upper middle-class backgrounds”, while a Netflix report claimed working-class parents did not see film and TV as a viable career for their children.Guardian analysis has found that almost a third (30%) of artistic directors and other creative leaders were privately educated, compared with a national average of just 7%. More than a third (36%) of the organisations’ chief executives or other executive directors went to private schools