Government officials ‘more pessimistic’ about financial health of rugby union

A picture


Government officials say they are increasingly pessimistic over the financial stability of professional rugby union, as they defended loans given to sports organisations during the pandemic.A National Audit Office (NAO) report published last year said that as much as £29m of a total £474m lent to sports organisations during the pandemic will not be recovered.Central among the defaulters are three rugby clubs – Worcester, Wasps and London Irish – who went into administration after being lent £41.6m in public money.Speaking in front of the Public Accounts Committee in parliament on Monday, the director general of policy at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), Polly Payne, said the government was now monitoring financial risks not only to clubs but the Premiership itself, and that concerns over financial viability had grown.

Asked by MPs if she anticipated more rugby clubs going into administration in future, Payne said: “We are absolutely reviewing and updating our forecasts.Are we more or less pessimistic than at the time when we gave the loans? I think given everything that has gone on in the sport, we are more pessimistic than we were then.I wouldn’t want to talk about our individual borrowers but absolutely we keep it under review and really care about it.“In rugby when we have been thinking about likely insolvencies and the financial strength of the individual clubs, we have also thought about the financial situation of the Premier League (sic) as a whole,” she continued.“We have not only been taking account of it, we’ve been using the government’s convening power to try and help with the financial sustainability.

We take this very seriously.”Payne defended the decision to award a total of £123.8m to Premiership clubs, a quarter of the total amount lent at the time.“It wasn’t that there was any special treatment and we didn’t think about it sport by sport,” she said.“I think it’s worth saying that the [total amount] we could have spent was underspent, so it was not the case that other sports missed out.

”Payne also argued that the clubs had shown themselves to be solvent before Covid struck, a key requirement of the loan system.“Unfortunately within the next three years, [those assessments were proven wrong]...but I have no reason to believe the information given at the time was inaccurate,” she said.

DCMS officials also pointed out that money had been retrieved from the three former Premiership clubs, more than £10m to date, and that a further between £7.3m and £11.1m is expected to be recouped from the nine recipients of Covid loans who have become insolvent.Also speaking in front of the committee, the most senior civil servant in the DCMS, the permanent secretary Susannah Storey, defended the Covid loan system, calling it a “relatively solid” approach.Sign up to The BreakdownThe latest rugby union news and analysis, plus all the week's action reviewedafter newsletter promotion“These were broadly effective interventions,” she said.

“We were quite careful at the time that the loans were given to have some specific due diligence on the borrowers.So we did know who they were.And as a result of that, the [NAO] evaluation showed that the fraud levels have been relatively low.So, we’ve definitely learned some lessons.We’ve definitely made some improvements as we’ve codified this process.

But I think with hindsight, it was a relatively solid intervention.”
businessSee all
A picture

Feeding frenzy: how army of advisers is making millions from Thames Water

Sewage floating down Britain’s rivers has become a pungent political symbol. But a recent court case over Thames Water’s debts was not concerned with the flow of water and effluent so much as the flow of money.Thames Water stands out amid the turmoil of the privatised water industry in England and Wales. Loaded up with about £19bn in debt, the company sought court approval to borrow as much as £3bn more from a group of existing creditors in a desperate attempt to avoid temporary nationalisation at the end of March.That process, known as special administration, would preserve the supply of water to 16m households and businesses in London and south-east England

A picture

UK Steel warns that Trump tariffs would be ‘devastating blow’

UK steelmakers have warned that the imposition of new US tariffs would be “a devastating blow” to the industry, after Donald Trump said he would announce 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium imports into the US.Gold reached a record high and aluminium prices rose as financial markets were rattled by the US president’s comments, which caused concern in the UK and the EU.Gareth Stace, the director general of the trade body UK Steel, said: “The US is our second-largest export market after the EU. At a time of shrinking demand and high costs, rising protectionism globally, particularly in the US, will stifle our exports and damage over £400m worth of the steel sector’s contribution to the UK’s balance of trade.”Stace said it would be “deeply disappointing” if Trump decided to target UK steel, given its “relatively small production volumes compared to major steel nations”

A picture

UK halves subsidies for Drax and says it must use 100% sustainable wood

The UK government has halved subsidies for the Drax power station and ordered it to use 100% sustainable wood after sustained criticism over its business model.The large power plant in North Yorkshire would play a “much more limited role” in future, operating less than half as often as it currently does, the government said.The plant is an important generator of electricity for the UK but has been criticised for burning wood pellets sourced from forests in the US and Canada.The government has agreed a new deal with the power producer that will halve subsidies between 2027 and 2031, saying that Drax will provide power only when it is “really” needed. It estimates that this will save consumers £170m a year

A picture

BP shares jump after feared US hedge fund Elliott takes stake

Shares in BP jumped 7% on Monday after it emerged that the activist investor Elliott Investment Management had taken a stake in the UK oil company.The stock rose as investors bet that Elliott, a feared New York hedge fund known for its attempts to shake up listed companies, would push for an overhaul of BP’s strategy, along with a revamp of its board.Elliott’s arrival could lead to the departure of BP’s chair, Helge Lund, and put pressure on its management to shift back more decisively towards fossil fuels, analysts said.Shares in the 120-year-old company rose by more than 8% in early trading on Monday, before closing up about 7% at 465p, the highest since last July and helping the FTSE 100 to hit a new record high.Elliott, led by the billionaire Paul Singer, has amassed a significant holding in the British energy company, Bloomberg reported on Saturday

A picture

Fraud trial of Forbes ‘30 Under 30’ honoree set to lift lid on startup culture

Charlie Javice has joined an undesirable club struck by the “Forbes 30 Under 30 curse”, a term for the high-flyers identified by the business title as up-and-comers who ended up in legal trouble. The entrepreneur has joined a list that includes the pharmaceuticals fraudster Martin Shkreli and FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried and Caroline Ellison.The strength of the Forbes “curse” will be tested this week in New York as Javice, 31, goes on trial on four counts of fraud relating to the $175m (£141m) sale of Frank, a student financial aid application assistance company she founded aged 24, to JP Morgan Chase. The deal quickly soured, and has descended into a legal wrangle that has been compared to the case of Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes.Frank’s premise was simple – to help steer students through the complexity of applying for student loans

A picture

Trump’s latest tariff bid shows the old rules of trade no longer apply. Scraps of paper will not save us | Greg Jericho

News that the US president, Donald Trump, was going to place a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminium imports in to the US came as it generally does with such things – out of the blue, with no reasoning, and little to no understanding of whether Trump even knows what he is doing.Speaking to reporters on Air Force One on the way to the Super Bowl, Trump talked about “reciprocal” tariffs. As an aside he said that “we’ll also be announcing steel tariffs on Monday” and when asked who they would affect he said “everyone”. When further asked about aluminium he replied “aluminium too” (because hey why bother to mention that upfront?).The headlines went crazy and we saw reports here of how $15bn was “wiped from the Australian share market” in the first hour of trading