‘Time running out’ for UK to apologise over forced adoptions

A picture


Time is running out for the UK government to issue a formal apology to women who were forced to give up their babies for adoption in the 1950s, 60s and 70s, campaigners have warned.Most of the estimated 185,000 women involved in forced adoptions are now in their 70s and 80s, and some have died without an apology on behalf of the state being issued.Many pinned their hopes on the Labour government after the previous Conservative administration said in 2023 that a formal government apology was not appropriate.But despite strong cross-party support for such a move, the government has failed to act.“Time is of the essence,” said Karen Constantine, of the Movement for an Adoption Apology (MAA) and the author of Taken: Experiences of Forced Adoption.

“The value of an apology would be immensely healing and resolve unimaginable pain endured for decades by an ageing cohort of women who had their babies taken from them.”Last year, Veronica Smith, one of the co-founders of the MAA, died aged 83.The loss of her daughter in a forced adoption in 1964 had “coloured the whole of my life”, she said.She had hoped to testify at a public hearing into forced adoptions, but the government dismissed calls for an inquiry in 2017.Discussions with senior Labour politicians before last year’s election led the MAA to believe that a formal apology would be issued if the party took power.

“It’s beyond disappointing that it hasn’t happened,” said Constantine.“My many formal and informal conversations led me to believe an apology would be forthcoming and that Keir Starmer would deliver it.”MPs and peers from all parties who had backed calls for an apology were unhappy with the lack of progress, she added.Lord Alton, the chair of parliament’s joint committee on human rights (JCHR), urged the government “to take ownership of resolving this wider legacy to mitigate the harm that was done” to women.“This isn’t about apportioning blame, but recognising the serious trauma and lasting pain suffered by so many people,” he told the Guardian, speaking in a personal capacity.

Helena Kennedy, a barrister and member of the JCHR, and Harriet Harman, a veteran Labour politician and a former chair of the JCHR, also said the government should issue a formal apology.State and church bodies “sustained a punitive culture of shaming young women who became pregnant outside of marriage”, said Kennedy.A JCHR inquiry into forced adoptions in 2021 that found the UK government was “ultimately responsible” for actions that inflicted harm inflicted on young, vulnerable women and children.“An apology by the government and an official recognition that what happened to these mothers was dreadful and wrong … would go some way to mitigate the pain and suffering of those affected,” it said.Responding to a request for comment from the children’s and families minister Janet Daby, a Department for Education spokesperson said: “This abhorrent practice should never have taken place, and our deepest sympathies are with all those affected.

We take this issue extremely seriously and continue to engage with those impacted to provide support and consider what more can be done.”The Scottish government issued a formal apology in 2023.Nicola Sturgeon, then Scotland’s first minister, said: “The issuing of a formal apology is an action that governments reserve as a response to the worst injustices in our history.” The Welsh government formally apologised for the “life-long heartbreak” caused by forced adoptions also in 2023.In 2018, Leo Varadkar, then Irish prime minister, told parliament: “What was done was … an historic wrong that we must face up to.

”Sign up to First EditionOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersafter newsletter promotionIn 2016, the head of the Catholic church in England and Wales apologised for its role in forced adoptions, and the Church of England also expressed “great regret”.The Catholic church, the C of E and the Salvation Army ran “mother and baby homes” and adoption agencies in the UK from the 1950s until the 1970s.Unmarried pregnant women were sent to the homes to give birth and hand over their babies for adoption.They were not told they could keep their children and had the right to welfare support.Adoption reached a peak in 1968, when more than 16,000 babies born to unmarried mothers were handed to new families.

Michael Lambert, an academic at Lancaster University who has researched forced adoptions, said the government decided not to take over the homes when the welfare state was created in the 1940s, but instead subsidised their services.“The weight of evidence from archive material and testimonials is huge,” he said.“It’s not just the birth mothers who are ageing and may not live to see an apology, there is also a generation of adoptees who deserve justice.”As well as a formal apology, the MAA wants government funding for support services for women and their children who were involved in forced adoptions and full access to historical records.
businessSee all
A picture

UK Steel warns that Trump tariffs would be ‘devastating blow’

UK steelmakers have warned that the imposition of new US tariffs would be “a devastating blow” to the industry, after Donald Trump said he would announce 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium imports into the US.Gold reached a record high and aluminium prices rose as financial markets were rattled by the US president’s comments, which caused concern in the UK and the EU.Gareth Stace, the director general of the trade body UK Steel, said: “The US is our second-largest export market after the EU. At a time of shrinking demand and high costs, rising protectionism globally, particularly in the US, will stifle our exports and damage over £400m worth of the steel sector’s contribution to the UK’s balance of trade.”Stace said it would be “deeply disappointing” if Trump decided to target UK steel, given its “relatively small production volumes compared to major steel nations”

A picture

UK halves subsidies for Drax and says it must use 100% sustainable wood

The UK government has halved subsidies for the Drax power station and ordered it to use 100% sustainable wood after sustained criticism over its business model.The large power plant in North Yorkshire would play a “much more limited role” in future, operating less than half as often as it currently does, the government said.The plant is an important generator of electricity for the UK but has been criticised for burning wood pellets sourced from forests in the US and Canada.The government has agreed a new deal with the power producer that will halve subsidies between 2027 and 2031, saying that Drax will provide power only when it is “really” needed. It estimates that this will save consumers £170m a year

A picture

BP shares jump after feared US hedge fund Elliott takes stake

Shares in BP jumped 7% on Monday after it emerged that the activist investor Elliott Investment Management had taken a stake in the UK oil company.The stock rose as investors bet that Elliott, a feared New York hedge fund known for its attempts to shake up listed companies, would push for an overhaul of BP’s strategy, along with a revamp of its board.Elliott’s arrival could lead to the departure of BP’s chair, Helge Lund, and put pressure on its management to shift back more decisively towards fossil fuels, analysts said.Shares in the 120-year-old company rose by more than 8% in early trading on Monday, before closing up about 7% at 465p, the highest since last July and helping the FTSE 100 to hit a new record high.Elliott, led by the billionaire Paul Singer, has amassed a significant holding in the British energy company, Bloomberg reported on Saturday

A picture

Fraud trial of Forbes ‘30 Under 30’ honoree set to lift lid on startup culture

Charlie Javice has joined an undesirable club struck by the “Forbes 30 Under 30 curse”, a term for the high-flyers identified by the business title as up-and-comers who ended up in legal trouble. The entrepreneur has joined a list that includes the pharmaceuticals fraudster Martin Shkreli and FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried and Caroline Ellison.The strength of the Forbes “curse” will be tested this week in New York as Javice, 31, goes on trial on four counts of fraud relating to the $175m (£141m) sale of Frank, a student financial aid application assistance company she founded aged 24, to JP Morgan Chase. The deal quickly soured, and has descended into a legal wrangle that has been compared to the case of Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes.Frank’s premise was simple – to help steer students through the complexity of applying for student loans

A picture

Trump’s latest tariff bid shows the old rules of trade no longer apply. Scraps of paper will not save us | Greg Jericho

News that the US president, Donald Trump, was going to place a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminium imports in to the US came as it generally does with such things – out of the blue, with no reasoning, and little to no understanding of whether Trump even knows what he is doing.Speaking to reporters on Air Force One on the way to the Super Bowl, Trump talked about “reciprocal” tariffs. As an aside he said that “we’ll also be announcing steel tariffs on Monday” and when asked who they would affect he said “everyone”. When further asked about aluminium he replied “aluminium too” (because hey why bother to mention that upfront?).The headlines went crazy and we saw reports here of how $15bn was “wiped from the Australian share market” in the first hour of trading

A picture

Tech firms call for zonal electricity pricing in UK to fuel AI datacentres

Tech companies are putting pressure on the UK government to encourage an AI datacentre boom in remote areas of Great Britain by offering some of the cheapest electricity prices in Europe.A report paid for by the tech companies Amazon and OpenAI has called on ministers to overhaul the UK’s electricity market by splitting it into different zones so that prices become more expensive in areas where power is in short supply, and cheaper in those where it is ample.This market arrangement, known as zonal pricing, would make areas such as Scotland a hotspot for AI datacentres – which use vast amounts of electricity – because of an abundance of windfarms and low population density, according to the report by the Social Market Foundation (SMF) thinktank.Keir Starmer said last month that artificial intelligence would be “mainlined into the veins” of the nation after putting in place a sweeping action plan to make the UK a world leader in the technology.However, the plans to host datacentres have attracted some scepticism, in part because the UK has some of the highest industrial electricity prices in the world and is pressing targets to virtually eliminate fossil fuels from the power system by the end of the decade