Keeping Gaie Delap in jail is a travesty of justice | Letters

A picture


Zoe Williams does well to highlight the absurdity of Gaie Delap’s case (This 77-year-old climate activist should never have been jailed – and now faces a Kafkaesque struggle to get out, 9 January),Recalling a 78-year-old woman convicted of a non-violent, peaceful protest to prison on a technicality makes a mockery of our justice system,Irrespective of opinions on Delap’s activism and actions and whether she should have been given a custodial sentence in the first place, it’s clear that she has been unfairly punished by an electronic tag system that is unfit for purpose, and a judicial process that is farcically failing,And this should be of significant concern to James Timpson, the prisons minister and the chair of the recently announced Women’s Justice Board – a board that will have a remit to reduce the number of people in prison and make innovative use of technological solutions in community sentencing,The use of electronic tagging is problematic and can be stigmatising.

Furthermore, women experiencing poverty, without access to secure housing and reliable electricity can be at risk of recall if they are unable to recharge their electronic tags.But it is the overuse of recall that is equally if not more worrying.Licence recalls increased by 44% from 2023 to 2024, with the huge majority of recalls relating to non-compliance, not reoffending.Decision-making around recalls is inconsistent and can vary significantly depending on the skills and experience of probation practitioners.And with a recalled prison population of more than 12,000 contributing to huge pressures on the prison system, it is impossible to argue that Delap’s situation is justifiable, reasonable or in the public interest in any way.

Abbi AyersDirector of strategic development for the National Women’s Justice Coalition As a former barrister and judge, this article highlights for me the main shortcomings of the rigid view of sentencing found in our courts.Sentencing guidelines, precedent, the court of public opinion and the desire to set an example come before plain common sense.Gaie Delap, a person with high ideals and an unblemished record in her late 70s should have never been awarded a custodial sentence after a guilty plea for this offence.The offence may well have caused inconvenience to members of the public, but any punishment would have marked the offence and there was no reason why her word that she would not commit a further offence should not have been accepted.The government should have intervened before, since it was no fault of hers that its agent, Serco, failed to provide an appropriate bracelet, to secure her release.

Rex Billingham Tunbridge Wells, Kent Why do Labour politicians turn from believers in radical change into cowards intimidated by the internet bullies and Tory press? How can they leave this poor 78-year-old woman in jail for doing exactly what they would have once envisioned themselves doing when younger? Throughout my life I have witnessed Labour fail to be radical, but this government is one of the weakest of them all.Ian TunnicliffHallin, Skye Zoe Williams is wrong to minimise the M25 climate action as “traffic disruption”.“Ambulance halting” and “NHS disrupting”, among other things, would be more accurate.It’s ridiculous that Gaie Delap is being kept in prison by Serco’s incompetence, but far from ridiculous that that’s where she finds herself.David ClearyLondon Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

technologySee all
A picture

British novelists criticise government over AI ‘theft’

Kate Mosse and Richard Osman have hit back at Labour’s plan to give artificial intelligence companies broad freedoms to mine artistic works for data, saying it could destroy growth in creative fields and amount to theft.The best-selling novellists spoke out after Keir Starmer a national drive to make the UK “one of the great AI superpowers” and endorsed a 50-point action plan that included changes to how technology firms can use copyrighted text and data to train their models.Ministers had been consulting on whether to allow the major tech companies to hoover up massive quantities of writing, music and other creative works unless copyright holders actively opt out.It is seen as a way of supercharging the growth of AI companies in the UK. Huge volumes of data are needed to train AI models and technology firms claim copyright laws create uncertainty, which risks holding back development

A picture

How to politicize the truth on Facebook, Instagram, and Wikipedia

Hello, and welcome back to TechScape. Last Tuesday, I predicted Meta would enter a new political era after the departure of Nick Clegg. Two hours after I published last week’s newsletter, Mark Zuckerberg declared that the new conservative phase would begin. It was sooner and more brazen than I had expected – and faster-paced. Zuckerberg announced he would disband Meta’s US fact-checking operation because he believes his fact-checkers have been too politically biased

A picture

Google investigated by UK watchdog over search dominance

Google is being investigated by the UK competition watchdog over the impact of its search and advertising practices on consumers, news publishers, businesses and rival search engines.The tech company accounts for more than 90% of general searches in the UK, according to the Competition and Markets Authority.The CMA estimates that search advertising costs the equivalent of nearly £500 for each UK household a year, which could be kept down with effective competition.The watchdog announced on Tuesday it will investigate if Google is blocking competitors from entering the market, and whether it is engaging in “potential exploitative conduct” by the mass collection of consumers’ data without informed consent.It will also investigate whether Google is using its position as the pre-eminent search engine to give an unfair advantage to its own shopping and travel services

A picture

Amazon makes ‘largest ever’ UK order of electric trucks to cut carbon emissions

Amazon is to deploy nearly 150 electric heavy goods vehicles as well as piling packages on to trains and post-style trolleys in an effort to reduce the carbon footprint of delivering goods in the UK.The tech company said it had bought more than 140 electric Mercedes-Benz heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) and eight Volvo lorries – which it says is the UK’s biggest order of electric trucks – that can take loads of up to 40 tonnes.The vehicles will hit the road over the next 18 months, increasing the online retailer’s electric HGV fleet from nine at present.The US-owned company’s switch to electric logistics is partly funded by the government under its zero emission HGV and infrastructure demonstrator programme (ZEHID). Amazon plans to install fast-charging points across its UK network to keep the trucks in action

A picture

Ministers consider ban on all UK public bodies making ransomware payments

Schools, the NHS and local councils will be banned from making ransomware payments under government proposals to tackle hackers.In a crackdown on such cyber-attacks, operators of critical national infrastructure will be barred from bowing to demands when criminal gangs hold IT systems hostage.Payouts by private companies will have to be reported to the government and could be blocked if they are made to sanctioned groups or foreign states. Reporting ransomware attacks will also be made mandatory if the proposals become law.The plans, described by one expert as “the most significant intervention against ransomware by any national government to date”, will bring other public bodies into line with government departments, which are already banned from making payments

A picture

Meta’s ditching of factcheckers is potentially dangerous and a disservice | Letters

Meta’s move to scrap factcheckers is not about “complexity”, as it says (Report, 8 January), but to support Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s agenda.It is widely agreed that effective, fast and unbiased factchecking is essential for the proper functioning of social media platforms. Similarly, principles of free speech are foundational to fostering communication and public debate in a healthy democratic society. Mark Zuckerberg’s announcement that Meta is to follow X in introducing user-generated notes raises serious concerns.The shift will intensify pressures on vulnerable groups, including children, minorities, gender rights advocates and LGBTQ+ communities, who are already targeted by hate speech