Anthony Joshua, Daniel Dubois and boxing’s broken mandatory challenger system
Boxing’s power brokers have again chosen short-term gain over the long-term health of the sport by marketing Joshua-Dubois as a fight for the world heavyweight championshipOn Saturday Anthony Joshua and Daniel Dubois will meet in the ring before more than 90,000 screaming fans at Wembley Stadium.It’s a quality match-up between two good fighters.But once again, boxing’s powers that be have chosen short-term gain over the long-term health of the sport by marketing Joshua-Dubois as a fight for the heavyweight championship of the world.It isn’t.The heavyweight champion of the world is Oleksandr Usyk.
He earned that designation by beating Joshua twice, knocking out Dubois, and winning a split decision against Tyson Fury in a fight to unify the division titles this past May.The unification of the four major sanctioning body belts is the most significant boxing-related accomplishment to date conducted under the auspices of Turki Alalshikh, the director of Saudi Arabia’s General Entertainment Authority.But looking for positive branding in the United Kingdom and hoping to promote a “Riyadh Season” event that doesn’t lose tens of millions of dollars, the Saudis are joining with Eddie Hearn and Frank Warren, who promote Joshua and Dubois respectively, to fragment the heavyweight crown again.Boxing has four major sanctioning bodies: the World Boxing Council, World Boxing Association, World Boxing Organization and International Boxing Federation.In this instance, the IBF belt has been pried from Usyk as a consequence of his choosing to fight a contractually mandated rematch against Fury in December rather than meet a less deserving “mandatory challenger” who he has already knocked out.
The mandatory challenger is an opponent who a champion is required to fight or vacate his title.The concept arose out of abuses in a long-ago era when boxing had eight weight classes with one champion in each division.“It used to be that a fighter got a title shot by beating the other best fighters around,” says boxing historian Mike Silver.“But the system didn’t always work, especially not for Black fighters.Charley Burley never got a title shot.
Archie Moore waited for years and had to sign with [manager] Jack Kearns before he got an opportunity,”Silver goes on to explain that, in the 1930s, a group of state athletic commissions joined together to form the National Boxing Association,Eventually, the NBA consisted of 43 state commissions, although New York (the most powerful commission in the country) wasn’t among them,When Mickey Walker gave up the middleweight title to campaign as a heavyweight, the NBA held a tournament to determine a successor,And it instituted a sanctioning fee for championship fights.
The fee was one dollar.The NBA also instituted a mandatory challenger system.One of the first fighters it stripped was Sugar Ray Robinson.In 1959, Robinson fought just once (against a club fighter named Bob Young, who he knocked out in two rounds).And the NBA stripped him of his title for refusing to fight a return bout against Carmen Basilio.
After that, only the New York and Massachusetts commissions recognized Robinson as middleweight champion and he lost to Paul Pender in his next fight.The NBA wasn’t perfect but there was a semblance of fairness to it.Then, in the early-1960s, the NBA evolved into the World Boxing Association and world sanctioning body “politics” took hold.The world sanctioning bodies today are motivated by making money for the private interests that control them.Promoters subsidize the organizations by paying to attend sanctioning-body conventions where they lobby for preferential treatment for their fighters, purchasing advertisements in sanctioning body journals, and the like.
But the sanctioning fees paid for fights constitute the world sanctioning bodies’ greatest source of income,The public is familiar with the sanctioning fees paid for world championship bouts,But fighters also pay sanctioning fees to fight for regional belts that move them up the ladder to “elimination bouts” and “box-offs” that then enable them to become a mandatory challenger,Without the mandatory designation to reach for, many of these sanctioning fees would disappear and market forces (including fan preferences) would dictate who champions fought,Mandatory defenses – or the refusal to fight in them – can have a big impact.
The most famous example of a fighter being stripped for not fighting a mandatory defense occurred in 1978 when the World Boxing Council stripped Leon Spinks of his title and proclaimed mandatory challenger Ken Norton “heavyweight champion of the world” after Spinks declared his intention to fight a rematch against Muhammad Ali.Norton was aligned with Don King (who had close ties with WBC president Jose Sulaiman).The Ali-Spinks rematch was promoted by Bob Arum.Those alliances were widely believed to have factored into Sulaiman’s thinking.Mandatory challenger designations also impact smaller fights.
Promoter Russell Peltz recalls how, years ago, the WBA made bantamweight champion Jeff Chandler fight a mandatory defense against Miguel Iriarte (who came from Panama, where the WBA was headquartered).Iriarte had achieved mandatory status without ever fighting quality opposition.His previous three fights had been against opponents who finished their ring careers with a composite record of zero wins against 11 losses.Chandler toyed with Iriarte and knocked him out in the ninth round.Mandatory defenses become even more of an issue when a fighter (such as Usyk) has earned all four belts, has four sanctioning bodies demanding mandatory defenses of him, and can’t fight often enough to satisfy everyone.
In that regard, former unified heavyweight champion Lennox Lewis recently declared, “When you put all the belts together, a lot of the promoters don’t like that because all the belts are in one place and they don’t get to bring their guy around to make money.For them, it is better that they’re split up.For the organizations, they don’t want that either.They want to be able to move [their belts] around.The only ones who want undisputed are the guys who are boxing for it and working towards it.
”Dubois followed a circuitous route to become the IBF’s mandatory challenger.He suffered his first loss in 2020 at age 23 when he chose to not continue against Joe Joyce after suffering a fractured left eye socket.That decision was understandable given the nature of the damage involved.More problematically, trailing badly on the judges’ scorecards in round nine of a title fight against Usyk last year, Dubois took a knee and quit.Dubois returned from his loss to Usyk to stop a grossly out-of-shape Jarrell Miller in Riyadh in 10 rounds.
Then, on 1 June of this year, he fought Filip Hrgovic (then the IBF’s mandatory challenger), also in Riyadh.Hrgovic has a less-than-stellar resume.Dubois knocked him out in the eighth round.That made Dubois the IBF’s new mandatory challenger.And despite Dubois having held that position for only a few weeks, the IBF demanded that Usyk fight Dubois for the second time in his next outing (which the Ukrainian couldn’t do because of his contractually mandated rematch against Fury).
So on 25 June, Usyk relinquished the IBF belt.Alalshikh could have intervened to keep Usyk from losing the IBF title.As things now stand, most powers in boxing are bending at the knee for Saudi money.His Excellency (as Alalshikh is known) could simply have said, “In the future, the General Entertainment Authority won’t deal with any sanctioning body, promoter, or fighter who is involved with a heavyweight championship fight for the vacant IBF belt.” But as noted above, branding Joshua-Dubois as a world championship fight suits the Saudis’ purposes.
Dubois has now been designated as the IBF “heavyweight champion” without ever having won an IBF championship fight.Technically, Joshua is the “challenger”, although in reality AJ is the A-side of the promotion and a 4-to-1 betting favorite.Formally, the fight is being marketed as a fight for the IBF heavyweight championship of the world.But “IBF” is often dropped from the chatter to propagate the view that this is for the heavyweight crown.The winner of Joshua-Dubois has been expected to challenge the winner of Usyk-Fury II for the heavyweight throne.
But there’s many a slip twixt cup and lip,Alalshikh said recently that, if Joshua wins, he’d like to match AJ against Fury next even if Tyson loses to Usyk for a second time,Meanwhile, the IBF will get a huge sanctioning fee from Joshua-Dubois,
Next reaps rewards as global fashion trends ‘converge’ via social media
Next has said international tastes in fashion are “converging” as tech platforms expose consumers to international trends, boosting the retailer’s overseas sales and helping it close in on £1bn in annual profits for the first time.The fashion and homeware retailer forecast its annual profits at £15m more than previously expected, at £995m – up from the £918m recorded in 2023 – after overseas sales rose by 23% in the six months to July, offsetting a near 1% decline in sales of Next-branded clothing in the UK.The company said that the “global reach” of tech platforms including Netflix, YouTube and TikTok were “exposing people to international fashion trends in a way they never have been before”, and improving international delivery networks were also encouraging “consumers to try clothes from other countries, and retailers to adapt their ranges that cater for overseas tastes”.“It appears that international tastes in clothing are converging more rapidly. This convergence is not uniform and is more pronounced in some territories than others,” the retailer said, adding that there remains a “marked difference between different cultures and climates”
The great divide: are office workers more productive than those at home?
Four years ago when the world of work was upended by the Covid pandemic, confident predictions were made that a permanent shift in remote working would follow the removal of lockdown restrictions.Much has clearly changed since. Some of the earliest preachers of the brave new teleworking world – including the US tech companies Google and Microsoft – are among the most vocal to repent.This week Amazon joined their ranks, handing down an edict to corporate employees demanding they return to the office five days a week, effective from 2 January. The chief executive, Andy Jassy, argues there are “significant” advantages to face-to-face working
Global AI fund needed to help developing nations tap tech benefits, UN says
Governments and private companies should contribute to a global artificial intelligence fund that will allow developing nations to benefit from advances in the technology, according to a UN report.The fund would help provide models, computing power and AI-related training programmes, according to recommendations from the UN secretary general’s high-level AI advisory body.Dame Wendy Hall, professor of computer science at the University of Southampton and a member of the UN’s advisory body on AI, said the western world must not make the same mistakes with the technology that it made with the climate crisis. Referring to developing countries outside the northern hemisphere, Hall said states unable to invest in AI should be given help.“If we don’t address an issue like a global AI fund now, we risk going down the same route as we did with climate change where developed countries are able to address the problem and race ahead while the global south is left behind and doesn’t have the capacity to address it,” she said
Australia’s unemployment rate unchanged at 4.2%, dampening hope of RBA interest rate cut
Australia’s economy added more jobs than expected in August as the unemployment rate remained steady, making a Reserve Bank interest rate cut less likely in the short term.The jobless rate in August was 4.2%, the Australian Bureau of Statistics reported on Thursday. Economists had it expected it to remain in line with the 4.2% in July
Federal Reserve cuts US interest rates for the first time in four years
The US Federal Reserve cut interest rates on Wednesday for the first time in four years, stepping back from its aggressive bid to cool the world’s largest economy and reduce inflation.America’s central bank, which lifted rates to a two-decade high after price growth surged to its highest level in a generation, announced a cut of 50 basis points.Policymakers at the Fed also expect to cut rates by an additional 50 basis points this year, according to projections released alongside the news. After rising on the news, Wall Street ended the day down slightly, with the S&P 500 dropping 0.29%
Fed chair Jerome Powell says US interest rate cut has nothing to do with election – as it happened
Fed chair Jerome Powell is delivering remarks right now about the half-point rate cut. Powell suggests, essentially, that the Fed is working toward a so-called “soft-landing” – bringing inflation down without hurting the jobs market.“This decision reflects our growing confidence that within appropriate recalibration of our policy stance, strength in the labor market can be maintained in a context of moderate growth and inflation moving sustainably down to 2,%” Powell said.Powell said that the labor market has “cooled from its formerly overheated state” and inflation has “eased substantially” – a marked difference in tone from press conferences over the last year, where Powell mostly spoke on concerns about price increases.Here’s a quick summary of what happened today:The US Federal Reserve cut interest rates by a sizeable half-point, the first cut since rates hit zero in 2020
Georgina Hayden’s recipe for charred corn, chorizo and avocado
Rukmini Iyer’s quick and easy hot smoked salmon frittatas with watercress and radishes – recipe | Quick and easy
‘We called her the vegetable whisperer’: Rachel Roddy on the cook who inspired her
Scissor-cut, stir-fry and ‘a hug in a bowl’: six great noodle recipes
Jeremy King: ‘The first time I was ever impressed by anyone was Meryl Streep’
Rahel Stephanie’s secret ingredient: pandan