Ditching of Facebook factcheckers a ‘major step back’ for public discourse, critics say
Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to ditch factcheckers on Facebook and “prioritise free speech” weeks before Donald Trump returns to power was condemned on Tuesday as a “major step back” for public discourse,The Meta founder announced multiple changes to his platforms including Facebook and Instagram in an attempt to “dramatically reduce the amount of censorship”,In a statement on Tuesday he said that, starting in the US, independent factcheckers would be replaced in the US by a system of “community notes” similar to that used on X, Elon Musk’s social media platform, which relies on users to add caveats and context to contentious posts,Content moderation teams would also be moved from California to Texas “where there is less concern about the bias of our teams”, said Zuckerberg in a five-minute video statement that Nina Jankowicz, a former US government official tasked with fighting disinformation, described as “a full bending of the knee to Trump”,Changes to the way Meta filtered content would also mean “we’re going to catch less bad stuff” while still taking seriously “a lot of legitimately bad stuff out there, drugs, terrorism, child exploitation”, Zuckerberg said.
He said factcheckers were “too politically biased” – an allegation strongly denied by factchecking organisations – and said Meta would “get rid of a bunch of restrictions on topics like immigration and gender that are just out of touch with mainstream discourse”.The 40-year-old billionaire said the shift was in response to the US presidential elections, which he labelled “a cultural tipping point towards, once again, prioritising speech”.Trump and Zuckerberg have had a rollercoaster relationship, with Trump threatening to jail the tech boss if he interfered in the election and then a November rapprochement with dinner at Mar-a-Lago and Zuckerberg donating $1m.Trump said on Tuesday that the changes were “probably” in response to his warnings and added: “I think they’ve come a long way, Meta, Facebook.”Last week it was announced that the former UK deputy prime minister Nick Clegg was stepping down as Meta’s president of global affairs to be replaced by the prominent Republican Joel Kaplan.
Dana White, the chief executive of the Ultimate Fighting Championship and a prominent Trump supporter, was also appointed to the Meta board as the tech company prepares for Trump’s second term, which is set to have a major influence over technology companies through investment, subsidies and regulation, particularly of artificial intelligence,But campaigners against harms caused via social media to women, children and ethnic minorities, as well as scientists, reacted to the news with dismay,Global Witness, a human rights group, said: “Zuckerberg’s announcement is a blatant attempt to cozy up to the incoming Trump administration – with harmful implications,These changes will make it more dangerous for women, LGBT+ people, people of colour, scientists and activists to speak out online, where they already face disproportionate harassment and attacks,”The Centre for Information Resilience, an organisation whose activities include tracking online hate speech and disinformation based on people’s gender, ethnicity and sexuality, warned it was a “major step back for content moderation at a time when disinformation and harmful content are evolving faster than ever”.
Ian Russell, the father of Molly Russell, 14, who took her life after viewing thousands of images promoting suicide and self-harm on social media, including Instagram, said the moves “could have dire consequences for many children and young adults”.He said he was “dismayed that the company intends to stop proactive moderation of many forms of harmful content and to only act if and when a user complaint is received”.Meta said content about suicide, self-injury and eating disorders would still be considered “high-severity violations” and it “will continue to use our automated systems to scan for that high-severity content”.The UK TV host Piers Morgan reflected a seam of support for Meta’s move when he welcomed it as “a complete U-turn on all woke censorship & cancel culture bullsh*t”.The co-chairs of Meta’s oversight board, including the former prime minister of Denmark Helle Thorning-Schmidt, said in a statement: “We look forward to working with Meta in the coming weeks to understand the changes in greater detail, ensuring its new approach can be as effective and speech-friendly as possible.
”They added: “It is essential that decisions on content are taken with maximum input from voices outside of Meta, including of the people who use its platforms every day.”In London a spokesperson for the prime minister, Keir Starmer, declined to be drawn on Zuckerberg’s remarks but stressed the UK had its own protections in the new Online Safety Act.“Our relationship with the US across a number of areas is a very important one,” they said, adding: “Our online safety provisions coming in March are among the strongest on offer.”A spokesperson for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology said: “We are looking closely at Meta’s announcement impacting its US platform.The UK’s Online Safety Act will oblige them to remove illegal content and content harmful to children here in the UK, and we continue to urge social media companies to counter the spread of misinformation and disinformation hosted on their platforms.
”Angie Drobnic Holan, the director of the International Fact-Checking Network which certified the factcheckers used by Meta, denied factcheckers had been biased and said: “That attack line comes from those who feel they should be able to exaggerate and lie without rebuttal or contradiction.”Chris Morris, the chief executive of the UK factchecking organisation Full Fact, which has been funded by Meta to check Facebook content, called the announcement “a backwards step that risks a chilling effect around the world”.He said his organisation’s factcheckers assessed claims “from all political stripes with equal rigour, and hold those in power to account through our commitment to truth”.“Locking factcheckers out of the conversation won’t help society to turn the tide on rapidly rising misinformation,” he said.Zuckerberg said removing some restrictions on content on topics such as gender and immigration would “make sure that people can share their beliefs and experiences on our platforms” and said the focus of filters that scanned posts for policy violations would be shifted to only tackling illegal and high-severity violations.
“By dialling them back, we’re going to dramatically reduce the amount of censorship on our platforms,” he said.“We’re also going to tune our content filters to require much higher confidence before taking down content.The reality is that this is a tradeoff.It means we’re going to catch less bad stuff, but we’ll also reduce innocent people’s posts and accounts that we accidentally take down.”He said Meta would “work with President Trump to push back on governments around the world that are going after American companies and pushing to censor more”.
He cited Europe as a place with “an ever-increasing number of laws institutionalising censorship and making it difficult to build anything innovative” and said: “Latin American countries have secret courts that can order companies to quietly take things down.”
OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman accused of sexual abuse by sister in lawsuit
The sister of the OpenAI chief executive, Sam Altman, has filed a lawsuit alleging that he regularly sexually abused her for several years, starting when they were children.The lawsuit filed on 6 January in a US district court in the Eastern District of Missouri alleges that the abuse began when Ann Altman was three and Sam Altman was 12. The filing alleges that the last instance of abuse took place when he was an adult but his sister, known as Annie, was still a child.The chief executive of the ChatGPT developer posted a joint statement on X, which he had signed along with his mother, Connie, and his younger brothers, Max and Jack, denying the allegations and calling them “utterly untrue”.“Our family loves Annie and is very concerned about her wellbeing,” the statement said
Elon Musk’s Tesla has received almost £200m in UK grants since 2016
Elon Musk’s electric vehicle company has received almost £200m in grants from the UK government since 2016, according to analysis.Tesla, which is run by the tech billionaire who has become increasingly vocal about the UK government, has received £191m from Westminster through grants, according to Tussell, which analyses public contract data.The bulk of the funds came from the Department for Transport (DfT), which has given the company £188m over that period.The transport funds related to the plug-in car grant, which was designed to encourage the uptake of EVs and plug-in hybrids. Introduced in 2011, the grant provided a discount towards the cost of new plug-in cars, initially at £5,000, until the scheme ended in June 2022
Meta scrapped factcheckers ‘because systems were too complex’
The co-chair of Meta’s oversight board said the company’s systems had become “too complex”, as the chief executive of Elon Musk’s X welcomed its decision to scrap factcheckers.Helle Thorning-Schmidt, the co-chair of the social media company’s oversight board and the former prime minister of Denmark, has said she and the departed president of global affairs, Nick Clegg, had agreed “Meta systems have been too complex”, adding that there had been “over-enforcement”.On Tuesday, Mark Zuckerberg made the surprise announcement that the Facebook owner would move away from using third-party checkers to flag misleading content in favour of notes from other users.The 40-year-old billionaire said that, starting in the US, Meta would “get rid of factcheckers and replace them with community notes similar to X”, as the company moves to prioritise free speech in the run-up to Donald Trump’s return to the White House.The move came only days after Clegg, Britain’s former deputy prime minister, left Meta after six years at the company, most recently in the role of president of global affairs
Mark Zuckerberg sports $900,000 watch as he calls time on Meta fact-checking
Mark Zuckerberg wore a rare Swiss watch worth nearly $900,000 as he announced a sweeping policy overhaul across Facebook and Instagram and offered to help Donald Trump take on governments deemed too censorious, according to a report.In a video message posted to Facebook on Tuesday, Zuckerberg vowed to prioritise free speech after the return of Trump to the White House, and said that Meta Platforms – the world’s largest social media business – would ditch its third-party fact-checkers and recommend more political content across its social networks.Meta, which also owns WhatsApp and Threads, plans to “work with President Trump to push back on governments around the world that are going after American companies and pushing to censor more”, Zuckerberg added.Meta would also “get rid of a bunch of restrictions on topics like immigration and gender” that were “out of touch with mainstream discourse”, the 40-year-old billionaire said, while wearing a Greubel Forsey “Hand Made 1” on his left wrist, Bloomberg reported. The watch retails for $895,500 before taxes, according to the outlet
Why did Mark Zuckerberg end Facebook and Instagram’s factchecking program?
Meta is shifting to the right, following the prevailing political winds blowing through the United States. A more partisan era now looms for the social media giant and its corporate leaders, though Mark Zuckerberg himself has few personal politics other than ambition.On Tuesday morning, Meta disbanded Facebook and Instagram’s third-party factchecking program. The company will also recommend more political content across its social networks.CEO Zuckerberg announced the changes as he attempts to curry favor with Donald Trump’s incoming administration, demonstrating just how far he will go to win the president-elect’s approval
Ditching of Facebook factcheckers a ‘major step back’ for public discourse, critics say
Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to ditch factcheckers on Facebook and “prioritise free speech” weeks before Donald Trump returns to power was condemned on Tuesday as a “major step back” for public discourse.The Meta founder announced multiple changes to his platforms including Facebook and Instagram in an attempt to “dramatically reduce the amount of censorship”.In a statement on Tuesday he said that, starting in the US, independent factcheckers would be replaced in the US by a system of “community notes” similar to that used on X, Elon Musk’s social media platform, which relies on users to add caveats and context to contentious posts.Content moderation teams would also be moved from California to Texas “where there is less concern about the bias of our teams”, said Zuckerberg in a five-minute video statement that Nina Jankowicz, a former US government official tasked with fighting disinformation, described as “a full bending of the knee to Trump”.Changes to the way Meta filtered content would also mean “we’re going to catch less bad stuff” while still taking seriously “a lot of legitimately bad stuff out there, drugs, terrorism, child exploitation”, Zuckerberg said
Philippe Carden obituary
Sales at toymaker Hornby up 7% after bumper Black Friday and Christmas
UK 10-year borrowing costs hit highest level since 2008, as Rachel Reeves’s fiscal headroom evaporates – as it happened
Why rising bond yields are rattling Rachel Reeves
City regulator vows to ease ‘burden’ on UK banks amid government pressure
Six big US banks quit net zero alliance before Trump inauguration