Why did Mark Zuckerberg end Facebook and Instagram’s factchecking program?
Meta is shifting to the right, following the prevailing political winds blowing through the United States,A more partisan era now looms for the social media giant and its corporate leaders, though Mark Zuckerberg himself has few personal politics other than ambition,On Tuesday morning, Meta disbanded Facebook and Instagram’s third-party factchecking program,The company will also recommend more political content across its social networks,CEO Zuckerberg announced the changes as he attempts to curry favor with Donald Trump’s incoming administration, demonstrating just how far he will go to win the president-elect’s approval.
“Recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech,” he said in a video posted on Instagram.“Factcheckers have just been too politically biased.”Notes from everyday users will replace corrections from vetted factchecking partners, similar to Twitter/X’s Community Notes feature.In a post on Threads, Meta’s answer to X, Zuckerberg also vowed to reduce “censorship mistakes”, rhetoric that mirrors US conservatives’ longstanding charges that Facebook and Instagram unfairly penalize conservatives, for which there is little evidence.He lambasted coverage of Trump by “legacy media, which has pushed to censor more and more” and said that his own company’s previous content moderation policies resulted in “too much censorship” and had “gone too far”.
Trump immediately welcomed the changes.Asked if Zuckerberg was making so many rapid changes in response to invective from Trump – the president-elect threatened the CEO with “life in prison” in August – Trump said: “Probably.Yeah.Probably.” Trump told Fox News that Meta had “come a long way” and that its “presentation was excellent”.
This article includes content provided by Instagram.We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies.To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'.The night before, Meta announced the appointment of Dana White, CEO of Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), the de facto sport of the Maga movement, to its board.White has backed Trump since 2016.
Last week, the company rid itself of its most prominent centrist, Nick Clegg, former UK deputy prime minister, and elevated its most prominent conservative to its top policy job, Joel Kaplan, former deputy chief of staff to the Republican US president George W Bush.It was Kaplan who authored the blogpost pronouncing the factchecking initiative dead.Kaplan has championed conservative causes inside and outside Meta.Within, he has pushed Meta to partner with rightwing news websites on factchecking; placed prominent Republicans in key roles; and advocated for Facebook not to restrict fake news, arguing such a crackdown would unfairly penalize conservatives.Without, he championed the nomination of the conservative justice Brett Kavanaugh to the US supreme court.
When Kavanaugh was called to testify about allegations of sexual assault, Kaplan sat behind him, visible on the aisle seat of the Senate chamber.Meta – not Zuckerberg personally – donated $1m to Trump’s inaugural fund, as have a host of tech leaders.The CEO did dine with Trump at Mar-a-Lago two weeks ago and gifted him a pair of Meta Ray-Bans, the company’s camera-equipped glasses.Meta’s most well-connected Democrat, Sheryl Sandberg, is no longer its chief operating officer nor even on its board.Zuckerberg has replaced her with White.
Where Sheryl Sandberg wrote the manual for white-collar feminism, Lean In, White was filmed slapping his wife at a party in 2022 after she slapped him.Sign up to TechScapeA weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our livesafter newsletter promotionZuckerberg’s moves mirror steps Elon Musk, who gave about $200m to elect Trump, has taken in his haphazard management of X.Musk likewise dispensed with any third-party factchecking on X in favor of elevating Community Notes, though there was less there to begin with than on Facebook, Instagram and Threads.“In a shift driven largely by Trump ally and X-owner Elon Musk, third-party factchecking has gone out of fashion among social executives.Social platforms have become more political and polarized, as misinformation has become a buzzword that encompasses everything from outright lies to viewpoints people disagree with,” said the eMarketer principal Jasmine Enberg.
Zuckerberg’s plays for approval from conservatives may spook liberals and even advertisers if Facebook and Instagram’s brand safety declines.They are ultimately unlikely to hurt Meta’s bottom line, though, she said.“Meta’s massive size and powerhouse ad platform insulate it somewhat from an X-like user and advertiser exodus.But any major drop-off in engagement could hurt Meta’s ad business, given the intense competition for users and ad dollars,” she said.In announcing the dissolution of Facebook and Instagram’s factchecking, Zuckerberg said he would likewise shunt Meta’s content moderation teams from the Golden state to the Lone Star state.
The CEO said the change of location would “help remove the concern that biased employees are overly censoring content”.Musk moved X’s headquarters to Texas from California, as he has done with SpaceX and Tesla.Zuckerberg believes that Trump is dictating the terms of mainstream discourse in 2025.The CEO wrote that Meta would “remove restrictions on topics like immigration and gender that are out of touch with mainstream discourse”.Immigration and gender – two of Trump’s main campaign issues, harped on about again and again at his speeches.
A dozen years ago, Zuckerberg wrote that immigration was vital to the US’s white-collar economy as he founded an organization to facilitate more of it, aligning with thrust of Barack Obama’s policies with the help of Sandberg,If one state is biased, so is its replacement,Facebook and Instagram are so large that their terms of service in effect set the Overton window for online conversation across the world,That window has moved to the political right,The politics and laws of the state California allows people obtaining driver’s licenses to choose a non-binary option for their gender, X.
Texas, by contrast, bans gender-affirming care for transgender minors.California’s governor has vowed to defend healthcare providers performing out-of-state abortions.Texas instituted a six-week abortion ban in 2021 before Roe v Wade was overturned.The laws and politics of the state will in part determine the acceptable range of discussion on Facebook and Instagram.
Tory and Reform MPs accused of ‘weaponising trauma’ of grooming victims, as Farage calls for inquiry to focus on Pakistani men – as it happened
Nigel Farage, the Reform UK, told MPs that that a new inquiry was needed specifically into the involvement of British Pakistanis in rape gangs.Speaking in the debate on the children’s wellbeing and schools bill, he claimed that, for the past 20 years, “at every attempt to try and have a proper national debate on the scale of this problem, it has been shut down”.He said that Keir Starmer has stressed the fact that an inquiry has already taken place. But grooming gangs were not mentioned once in the 459-page report from the independent inquiry in child sexual abuse, he said, and Rotherham was only mentioned once.That inquiry was so wide-ranging it was like a shotgun, he said
Letter: John Prescott obituary
When the National Assembly for Wales was established in 1999, John Prescott had a raft of responsibilities, including devolution and transport. One scheme under application at the time was the Welsh Highland Railway, running for 25 miles from Caernarfon to Porthmadog – an initiative of the Ffestiniog Railway.The National Assembly came into being on 1 July. The various powers devolved to it came into effect and replaced the Westminster authority and procedures.Some people in Eryri (Snowdonia) were strongly opposed to the Welsh Highland Railway
Kemi Badenoch tells Tories: don’t expect big policy plans for two years
Kemi Badenoch has told her shadow cabinet not to expect any big Conservative policy announcements for the next two years.At a meeting with shadow ministers on Tuesday, the Tory leader said she would not announce any detailed policies until at least 2027 because the focus until then should be regaining voters’ trust.The Sun, which first reported the development, said Badenoch presented MPs with a three-year programme for turning around her party’s fortunes under which it would not set out its plans for government before the end of 2027.A Conservative spokesperson said on Wednesday: “What you can see is, as we did with the immigration announcement last month, is that we will show you our direction of travel.“So we said that we will have a strict numerical cap [on immigration], we said that we’ll have a restriction on visas, but we’re not setting out the fine details of those because we’re not creating policies for 2028 in 2025
Starmer attacks Badenoch over call for new inquiry into sexual abuse gangs
Keir Starmer has accused Kemi Badenoch of “bandwagon jumping” in calling for a new inquiry into sexual abuse gangs, as he condemned the Conservative leader for her plan to try to vote down a bill on children’s wellbeing.In sometimes bitter exchanges at prime minister’s questions, as the topic of grooming gangs continued to dominate the political agenda, Starmer accused Badenoch of only taking an interest in the subject after Elon Musk repeatedly tweeted about it.“She met her recently acquired view that it’s a scandal, having spent a lot of time on social media over Christmas,” the prime minister told the Conservative leader. “Not once in eight years did she stand here and say what she just said.”Starmer accused Badenoch, who had said resisting a new inquiry would spark speculation about a “cover-up” in government, of being more interested in “tweeting and talking” than taking action on behalf of victims
Jenrick shape-shifts on air with reality-bending Today interview | John Crace
You can tell that Elon Musk must have overstepped the mark when even Kemi Badenoch has taken a break from tweeting her support for the ketamine-riddled world’s richest man. The Tory leader’s reality is largely shaped by what she reads on social media, so unless she’s taken time out to help the Muskster find a drug counsellor, she’s decided that she’d be better off keeping quiet for a while. Quite the concession for a politician who never knowingly avoids the chance to make a bad situation worse.But you can always rely on Robert Jenrick to step into any vacuum. It’s hard to know who the real Honest Bob really is
Elon Musk knows ‘absolutely nothing’ about women and girls’ safety, says Jess Phillips
Elon Musk knows “absolutely nothing” about protecting women and girls, Jess Phillips has said after the billionaire called her a “rape genocide apologist” and an “evil witch”.Speaking for the first time since Musk’s flurry of abuse to his 210 million followers on X, Phillips, the safeguarding minister, said the comments had made her more worried about her safety.In an interview with ITV News, Phillips also defended her decision to refuse a council’s request for a second national inquiry into so-called grooming gangs, saying a local process would achieve real change more quickly.Phillips’ decision over Oldham council’s request for a national inquiry was the prompt for Musk to take an interest in the issue of the grooming scandal in a series of UK towns and cities, including calling for Keir Starmer to be removed as prime minister.“It’s ridiculous isn’t it,” Phillips said when asked how she felt about Musk targeting her
OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman accused of sexual abuse by sister in lawsuit
Elon Musk’s Tesla has received almost £200m in UK grants since 2016
Meta scrapped factcheckers ‘because systems were too complex’
Mark Zuckerberg sports $900,000 watch as he calls time on Meta fact-checking
Why did Mark Zuckerberg end Facebook and Instagram’s factchecking program?
Ditching of Facebook factcheckers a ‘major step back’ for public discourse, critics say