Rachel Reeves dashes hopes of early breakthrough in UK-US trade deal
Rachel Reeves has dashed hopes of an early breakthrough in trade talks with the Trump administration, stressing that the UK is “not going to rush” into a deal,Speaking before her first face-to-face meeting with the US Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, in which she was expected to lobby him to reduce tariffs, the chancellor said negotiations would take time,“We’re not going to rush a deal,We want to get the right deal that’s in our national interest, and those talks are ongoing,” she said,Asked about her discussions with Bessent – the first time the pair will meet face to face – Reeves said: “We’re not going to be, I don’t think, discussing the intricacies of autos and food standards.
”Instead, she said, they would be talking about “how we can build on the trade relationship that we have”.The UK has already offered concessions to the US in the hopes of getting tariffs cut, including reducing the digital services tax on US tech companies.Reeves travelled to Washington for the spring meetings of the IMF with hopes of securing a carve-out from the 25% levies on cars, aluminium and steel.Car industry bosses have warned job losses are weeks away in Britain’s premium automotive sector unless the UK can secure a deal to shield the likes of Jaguar Land Rover, Rolls-Royce, Bentley, Aston Martin and McLaren from tariffs.It is unclear whether an exemption from the 10% base tariff Donald Trump has levied on all imports is on the table.
Hopes of an early agreement were undermined on Wednesday by a leaked document setting out new US demands.The text, which first appeared in the Wall Street Journal, dismayed UK officials by including calls for concessions in a series of new areas, including a demand for the government to drop its standards on agricultural products including beef.Allowing US hormone-treated beef into the UK has long been a demand from Washington, which successive British governments of all stripes have rejected.Reducing agricultural standards is a particular red line for Labour because it would kill hopes of a veterinary agreement with the EU.Reeves flatly rejected the idea that food or other product standards would be up for grabs.
“We’re not going to be relaxing our food standards,We are clear with the US about that and they respect that and understand that,” she said,She added: “These are all discussions around tariffs and trade barriers but we are not going to be changing our standards based on asks from foreign governments,Decisions around food standards, around digital services, around auto standards, are decisions for the UK government to make and we will continue to do that,”She did not rule out discussing another request in the leaked US negotiating document, that the UK should reduce import tariffs on US cars from 10% to 2.
5% to secure a deal.“I’m not going to give a commentary on the numbers but I have always been clear that I believe in free trade,” Reeves said.Later on Wednesday, appearing at a live event for global investors, Reeves appeared to hint that the UK was indeed prepared to cut import taxes on some US goods to placate Washington.“There are still tariffs, both ways, even before ‘liberation day’, between our two economies.I would like to see those tariffs – and non-tariff barriers – reduce,” she said.
Reeves’s cautious tone contrasted with recent mood music from the government suggesting much of the deal had all but been agreed,Asked about the urgent plight of UK carmakers, Reeves said: “We’re under no illusions about the scale of the challenges that tariffs pose to UK car manufacturers and beyond, which is why we are working to secure a deal,“But I think everybody agrees that the most important thing is that we get the right deal for Britain in our national interest, rather than rush into a poor deal,”Sign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningafter newsletter promotionOne British official said the leak of Washington’s demands showed how difficult finalising a deal was likely to be, despite positive remarks from Trump’s vice-president, JD Vance, who said last week there was a “good chance” of agreement,“The recent JD Vance comments got a lot of hares running but things like this show why this deal will be much more complex to agree than lots of people think,” the official said.
British ministers presented a draft text of a deal to their US counterparts even before Trump had announced his tariffs.However, the Guardian revealed this week that the agreement does not cover pharmaceutical products.Officials say it will therefore need to be renegotiated, should the president follow through on his promise to target that industry as well.“Our assumptions have had to be reset a few times during this process,” said one Whitehall source, “and they probably will be again.”The Bank of England governor, Andrew Bailey, speaking in Washington, said he and his colleagues were concerned about the risks to economic growth in the UK from the chaos in the global trading system.
“We do have to take very seriously the risk to growth,” he said.“Because the UK is such an open economy, so when we do our modelling … we also have to take into consideration the effect on growth in the rest of the world.”Earlier on Wednesday, official figures underlined the perilous fiscal position the government faces.The Office for National Statistics said borrowing in the financial year ending in March was £151.9bn, more than £20bn higher than in the previous financial year.
Asked about the downbeat figures, which prompted some analysts to reiterate warnings that she may have to raise taxes in her autumn budget, Reeves stressed that her fiscal rules were non-negotiable.“The numbers today just reinforce to me the importance that this government is placing on controlling the public finances,” she said.The chancellor announced welfare cuts and reductions to future Whitehall budgets in her spring statement last month in order to meet her self-imposed fiscal rules.As Reeves prepared to meet her counterparts from a string of other large economies in Washington, shares on global stock markets were soaring after Trump appeared to indicate a softening of his stance on Chinese tariffs.The US president said he expected that tariffs on China would “come down substantially, but it won’t be zero”.
Beijing has been facing 145% tariffs and has hit back with 125% levies of its own.The IMF’s spring meetings in Washington opened on Tuesday with a stark warning about the economic impact of the trade war, which the fund said would prompt a “major negative shock”.Later on Wednesday, Trump said that tariffs on Canadian-made cars “could go up” past 25%, adding: “I really don’t want cars from Canada.”
Charities attack Farage claims of ‘mental illness problems’ overdiagnosis
Nigel Farage says the UK is “massively overdiagnosing those with mental illness problems” and creating a “class of victims”.In comments, which have drawn criticism from campaigners and charities, the leader of Reform UK said it was too easy to get a mental health diagnosis from a GP.“It’s a massive problem. I have to say, for my own money, when you get to 18 and you put somebody on a disability register, unemployed, with a high level of benefits, you’re telling people aged 18 that they’re victims,” he told a local elections press conference in Dover.“And if you are told you’re a victim, and you think you’re a victim, you are likely to stay [a victim]
Lowering the voting age will benefit democracy | Letters
Simon Jenkins disagrees with the government’s proposal to reduce the voting age to 16 (Votes for 16-year-olds? Sorry, but I’m not convinced, theguardian.com, 17 April). But the voting age of 18 is an arbitrary threshold. Quite a recent one too – until 1969 the minimum voting age in Britain was 21. Other countries have minimum voting ages from 16 to 21
Nige doubling up, Dicky in No 11 and 30p Lee at foreign? Run for the hills! | John Crace
With two opinion polls giving the Reform party a clear lead over Labour and the Conservatives, it may be time to start thinking about some practicalities. Like, just who will be doing what job in a Reform-led government?It can probably be taken it as read that Nigel Farage will be prime minister, but that leaves three MPs – make that two, as James McMurdock isn’t trusted enough by his colleagues to be allowed out in public – to fill the remaining 20-plus cabinet posts. Unless we take it that two dozen or so newly elected MPs with no experience of anything will be drafted in by Nige after the 2029 election. Run for the hills, everyone.It’s probably fair to assume that Richard Tice has his eyes on becoming chancellor
Planning bill would allow builders to ‘pay cash to trash’ nature, say UK experts
Leading economists, former government advisers and ecologists are calling for a key section of the government’s planning bill to be changed because it creates a “licence to kill nature”.Sir Partha Dasgupta, professor emeritus of economics at the University of Cambridge, ecology professor Sir John Lawton and Dr Tom Tew, a former chief scientist of Natural England, are among the signatories to a letter to MPs that warns them to ignore government slogans and false rhetoric about nature and wildlife being a block to growth.The letter warns that part three of the planning and infrastructure bill, applying mainly to England and Wales, allows developers to pay “cash to trash” wildlife and the environment. They say it allows companies to sidestep environmental laws affecting their project by instead paying into a national nature levy.“It is a blunt instrument that rewards bad planning and penalises good practice, all the while adding cost and delay to the planning and development process,” the letter said
Making plans for Nigel: tense Tories wonder whether Badenoch has what it takes to see off Reform | Pippa Crerar
Some veteran Conservatives are so convinced that Robert Jenrick, the ambitious shadow justice secretary, is intent on striking an election pact with Reform UK that they have nicknamed him “Nigel’s chancellor”.The joke, however, gets to the heart of what many of them fear most: that the Tory party is in such a parlous state that their only hope of survival will be to work with Nigel Farage to unite the right.Kemi Badenoch, the party leader, has ruled this out, pointing out that Farage vowed to “destroy” the Conservatives. But she has struggled to escape constant speculation about her own leadership as her party struggles to adjust to its new reality in the political wilderness.Tensions bubbled over again this week when it emerged that Jenrick, who lost the leadership contest but who has made little secret of his ambitions, had told a private meeting he would try to ensure that the Tories and Reform did not compete against each other at the next election
Rachel Reeves dashes hopes of early breakthrough in UK-US trade deal
Rachel Reeves has dashed hopes of an early breakthrough in trade talks with the Trump administration, stressing that the UK is “not going to rush” into a deal.Speaking before her first face-to-face meeting with the US Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, in which she was expected to lobby him to reduce tariffs, the chancellor said negotiations would take time.“We’re not going to rush a deal. We want to get the right deal that’s in our national interest, and those talks are ongoing,” she said.Asked about her discussions with Bessent – the first time the pair will meet face to face – Reeves said: “We’re not going to be, I don’t think, discussing the intricacies of autos and food standards
US and China holding talks on trade war, Trump says after Beijing rebuttal
Nissan warns of £4bn loss as costs rise and Trump tariffs loom
IMF urges global leaders to resolve trade tensions rapidly, as China tells US to ‘cancel all unilateral tariffs’ – as it happened
Magnum and Ariel makers say prices may rise further amid tariff pressures
IMF chief urges US to strike trade deals swiftly to limit damage to global economy
US drug firm Merck says existing Trump tariffs will cost it $200m this year